Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34764212›Full record

ReviewHeart (British Cardiac Society)2022

Aspirin and statin therapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in older adults.

Sophie Montgomery, Michael D Miedema, John A Dodson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Cholesterol: Facts and Opinions by a Non-lipid Cardiologist.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie MontgomeryNYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU, New York, New York, USA.
Michael D MiedemaNolan Center For Cardiovascular Health, Minneapolis Heart Institute and Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
John A DodsonNYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU, New York, New York, USA John.Dodson@nyumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0163-3013
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation · USNew York University · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

Geriatric impairments, risk of treatment-related harms, and shared decision-making among older adults with acute myocardial infarctionK23AG052463 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DODSON, JOHN A · 2016 to 2019
$658k
Midcareer award in aging-related subspecialty researchK24AG080025 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI John A Dodson · 2023 to 2026
$495k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG052463NIA NIH HHS K24 AG080025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value of primary preventative therapies for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in older adults (age ≥75 years) is less certain than in younger patients. There is a lack of quality evidence in older adults due to underenrolment in pivotal trials. While aspirin is no longer recommended for routine use in primary prevention of CVD in older adults, statins may be efficacious. However, it is unclear which patient subgroups may benefit most, and guidelines differ between expert panels. Three relevant geriatric conditions (cognitive impairment, functional impairment and polypharmacy) may influence therapeutic decision making; for example, baseline frailty may affect statin efficacy, and some have advocated for deprescription in this scenario. Evidence regarding statins and incident functional decline are mixed, and vigilance for adverse effects is important, especially in the setting of polypharmacy. However, aspirin has not been shown to affect incident cognitive or functional decline, and its lack of efficacy extends to patients with baseline cognitive impairment or frailty. Ultimately, the utility of primary preventative therapies for CVD in older adults depends on potential lifetime benefit. Rather than basing treatment decisions on absolute risk alone, consideration of comorbidities, polypharmacy and life expectancy should play a significant role in decision making. Coronary calcium score and new tools for risk stratification validated in older adults that account for the competing risk of death may aid in evaluating potential benefits. Given the complexity of therapeutic decisions in this context, shared decision making provides an important framework.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesFrailtyHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAgedAspirinHumansPrimary PreventionAspirinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsatherosclerosisclinicalpharmacology

Identifiers

PMID34764212
PMCPMC11977457
OpenAlexW3213527271

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.