Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34773564›Full record

ArticlePituitary2022

Efficacy of temozolomide combined with capecitabine (CAPTEM) on refractory prolactinomas as assessed using an ex vivo 3D spheroid assay.

Atsushi Ishida, Hiroki Shichi, Hidenori Fukuoka, Naoko Inoshita, Wataru Ogawa, Shozo Yamada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Aggressive Pituitary Tumors and Pituitary Carcinomas: From Pathology to Treatment.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Atsushi IshidaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Moriyama Memorial Hospital, 134-0081, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki ShichiDivision of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 650-0017, Kobe, Japan.
Hidenori FukuokaDivision of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, 650-0017, Kobe, Japan. fukuokah@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-653X
Naoko InoshitaDepartment of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, 173-0015, Tokyo, Japan.
Wataru OgawaDivision of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 650-0017, Kobe, Japan.
Shozo YamadaHypothalamic & Pituitary Center, Moriyama Neurological Center Hospital, 134-0088, Tokyo, Japan.
Kobe University · JPKobe University Hospital · JPMaruyama Memorial General Hospital · JPTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital · JP

Funding

grant-in-aid for scientific research from japan ministry of education, culture, sports, science, and technology 19K09003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRefractory prolactinomas resistant to dopamine agonists (DAs) pose a clinical challenge. Temozolomide (TMZ) is a recommended treatment option, but its effects are difficult to predict, and the alternatives are limited. Recent reports suggested that TMZ combined with capecitabine (CAPTEM) can be effective for the treatment of aggressive pituitary tumors. This study sought to evaluate the effect of TMZ in an ex vivo three-dimensional (3D) spheroid culture assay and determine if this assay could be used to predict the therapeutic effect of CAPTEM in actual refractory prolactinomas.

methodsSurgically resected tumor tissues from two patients with refractory prolactinoma were cultured as 3D spheroids. The effects of TMZ were assessed based on its suppression of cell viability and reduction of prolactin (PRL) levels.

resultsIn Case 1, the 3D culture assay showed no effect of TMZ on cell viability or PRL suppression. Clinically, TMZ treatment did not reduce PRL levels (8870→8274 ng/mL) and the tumor progression. However, CAPTEM partially reduced PRL levels (9070→4046 ng/mL) and suppressed the tumor growth. In Case 2, TMZ in the 3D culture assay showed a 50% reduction of cell viability and 40% reduction of PRL levels. Clinically, CAPTEM was highly effective, with a considerable reduction in PRL level (17,500→210 ng/mL), and MRI showed almost no residual tumor.

conclusionsThis is the first report to describe the effects of CAPTEM treatment on refractory prolactinomas. The ex vivo 3D spheroid culture assay reliably predicted TMZ sensitivity and informed the selection between TMZ or CAPTEM treatment for refractory prolactinomas.

Indexed as

Pituitary NeoplasmsProlactinomaCapecitabineDopamine AgonistsHumansTemozolomideCapecitabineDopamine AgonistsTemozolomide3D spheroid cultureCapecitabineCAPTEMMGMTRefractory prolactinomaTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID34773564
OpenAlexW3211617490

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.