Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34784373›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

A randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled study of left prefrontal cortex 15 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in cocaine consumption and craving.

Francesco Lolli, Maya Salimova, Maenia Scarpino, Giovanni Lanzo, Cesarina Cossu, Maria Bastianelli, Brunella Occupati, Filippo Gori, Amedeo Del Vecchio, Anita Ercolini and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03607591 (Efficacy of High Frequency), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03607591 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of High Frequency (15Hz) Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Decreasing Intake in Patients With Cocaine Use Disorder: Study Protocol for a Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria CareggiRan2018 to 2020Enrolled65ConditionsCocaine Use DisorderArmsrTMS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuromodulation therapies for substance use disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Abnormal ventromedial-to-dorsolateral hierarchical topography of striatal circuits in cocaine use disorder and its modulations by brain stimulation.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Driving innovation in addiction treatment: role of transcranial magnetic stimulation.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco LolliDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7181-6806
Maya SalimovaDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Maenia ScarpinoAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Careggi, Neurophysiology Unit, Firenze, Italy.
Giovanni LanzoAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Careggi, Neurophysiology Unit, Firenze, Italy.
Cesarina CossuAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Careggi, Neurophysiology Unit, Firenze, Italy.
Maria BastianelliAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Careggi, Neurophysiology Unit, Firenze, Italy.
Brunella OccupatiAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Careggi, Clinical Toxicology and Poison Control Centre, Firenze, Italy.
Filippo GoriDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Amedeo Del VecchioDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Anita ErcoliniDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Silvia PascoloDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Virginia CiminoDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Nicolò MeneghinDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Fabio FieriniDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Giulio D'AnnaDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Matteo InnocentiDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Andrea BalleriniAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Careggi, Clinical Psychiatry, Firenze, Italy.
Stefano PallantiDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Antonello GrippoAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Careggi, Neurophysiology Unit, Firenze, Italy.
Guido MannaioniDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, Department of Health Sciences DSS, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCocaine use disorder (CUD) is a global health issue with no effective treatment. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a recently proposed therapy for CUD.

methodsWe conducted a single-center, randomised, sham-controlled, blinded, parallel-group research with patients randomly allocated to rTMS (15 Hz) or Sham group (1:1) using a computerised block randomisation process. We enrolled 62 of 81 CUD patients in two years. Patients were followed for eight weeks after receiving 15 15 Hz rTMS/sham sessions over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during the first three weeks of the study. We targeted the DLFPC following the 5 cm method. Cocaine lapses in twice a week urine tests were the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were craving severity, cocaine use pattern, and psychometric assessments.

findingsWe randomly allocated patients to either an active rTMS group (32 subjects) or a sham treatment group (30 subjects). Thirteen (42%) and twelve (43.3%) of the subjects in rTMS and sham groups, respectively, completed the full trial regimen, displaying a high dropout rate. Ten/30 (33%) of rTMS-treated patients tested negative for cocaine in urine, in contrast to 4/27 of placebo controls (p = 0.18, odd ratio 2.88, CI 0.9-10). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve did not state a significant change between the treated and sham groups in the time of cocaine urine negativisation (p = 0.20). However, the severity of cocaine-related cues mediated craving (VAS peak) was substantially decreased in the rTMS treated group (p<0.03) after treatment at T1, corresponding to the end of rTMS treatment. Furthermore, in the rTMS and sham groups, self-reported days of cocaine use decreased significantly (p<0.03). Finally, psychometric impulsivity parameters improved in rTMS-treated patients, while depression scales improved in both groups.

conclusionsIn CUD, rTMS could be a useful tool for lowering cocaine craving and consumption.

trial registrationThe study number on clinicalTrials.gov is NCT03607591.

Indexed as

AdultCocaine-Related DisordersDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexPsychometricsSurvival AnalysisTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34784373
PMCPMC8594832
OpenAlexW3214096461

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.