ArticleNucleic acids research2022
From genotype to phenotype in Arabidopsis thaliana: in-silico genome interpretation predicts 288 phenotypes from sequencing data.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- End-to-end deep learning methods for genetic risk prediction of schizophrenia.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Explainable deep learning for stratified medicine in inflammatory bowel disease.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Genomic prediction with kinship-based multiple kernel learning produces hypothesis on the underlying inheritance mechanisms of phenotypic traits.Genome biology · 2025Article
- A Feature Engineering Method for Whole-Genome DNA Sequence with Nucleotide Resolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Biologically meaningful genome interpretation models to address data underdetermination for the leaf and seed ionome prediction in Arabidopsis thaliana.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of machine learning methods for genomic prediction of selected Arabidopsis thaliana traits.PloS one · 2024Article
- Genome interpretation in a federated learning context allows the multi-center exome-based risk prediction of Crohn's disease patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Large sample size and nonlinear sparse models outline epistatic effects in inflammatory bowel disease.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Editorial: Towards genome interpretation: Computational methods to model the genotype-phenotype relationship.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In many cases, the unprecedented availability of data provided by high-throughput sequencing has shifted the bottleneck from a data availability issue to a data interpretation issue, thus delaying the promised breakthroughs in genetics and precision medicine, for what concerns Human genetics, and phenotype prediction to improve plant adaptation to climate change and resistance to bioagressors, for what concerns plant sciences. In this paper, we propose a novel Genome Interpretation paradigm, which aims at directly modeling the genotype-to-phenotype relationship, and we focus on A. thaliana since it is the best studied model organism in plant genetics. Our model, called Galiana, is the first end-to-end Neural Network (NN) approach following the genomes in/phenotypes out paradigm and it is trained to predict 288 real-valued Arabidopsis thaliana phenotypes from Whole Genome sequencing data. We show that 75 of these phenotypes are predicted with a Pearson correlation ≥0.4, and are mostly related to flowering traits. We show that our end-to-end NN approach achieves better performances and larger phenotype coverage than models predicting single phenotypes from the GWAS-derived known associated genes. Galiana is also fully interpretable, thanks to the Saliency Maps gradient-based approaches. We followed this interpretation approach to identify 36 novel genes that are likely to be associated with flowering traits, finding evidence for 6 of them in the existing literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.