Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34796160›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

Why are Birth Defects Surveillance Programs Important?

Débora Gusmão Melo, Maria Teresa Vieira Sanseverino, Thanyse de Oliveira Schmalfuss, Mariela Larrandaburu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System: a 40-year review with prevalence and trends for selected congenital anomalies, 1997-2019.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Débora Gusmão MeloDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil.
Maria Teresa Vieira SanseverinoSchool of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Thanyse de Oliveira SchmalfussSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Mariela LarrandaburuDisability and Rehabilitation Program, Ministry of Public Health of Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesPopulation SurveillanceHumansPublic Healthbirth defectscongenital anomaliesepidemiological monitoringnewborn screeningpublic health surveillanceregistriesteratogens

Identifiers

PMID34796160
PMCPMC8592920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.