Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34799181›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2022

"It's no good but at least I've always got it round my neck": A postphenomenological analysis of reassurance in assistive technology use by older people.

Jennifer Lynch, Gemma Hughes, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Joseph Wherton, Christine A'Court

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer LynchCentre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire and National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration East of England, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.lynch5@herts.ac.uk.
Gemma HughesNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Chrysanthi PapoutsiNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Joseph WhertonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christine A'CourtNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT104830MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The provision of reassurance is seen as a goal and benefit of the use of assistive technology (AT) in supporting people to manage their health and care needs at a distance. Conceptually, reassurance in health and care settings remains under-theorised with the benefits of experiencing reassurance through technology use assumed rather than understood. UK health and social care service goals of managing safety and risk have largely been equated with providing reassurance to users of AT and their carers. What has not been explored is how reassurance is experienced variably by users of different types of technology-enabled care. We present data from 3 case studies of different technologies in use in health and social care provision, analysed through a postphenomenology and sociomaterial lens. Our findings point to reassurance as an important facet of AT provision but the intended functions and uses of technological devices alone did not account for people's experiences of reassurance. Participant narratives referred variously to the comfort of being monitored, having their illness/wellness verified by the device, feeling reassured by the promise of help if needed, and imbuing the device with symbolic meaning (when the user associated the device with meanings and functions other than its technical capabilities). The different ways in which reassurance was experienced provides a useful way of understanding the potential tensions with AT policy goals as well as the positive meaning attributed to devices in some cases. This study reaffirms the importance of AT implementation being anchored in what matters to the user.

Indexed as

Self-Help DevicesAgedCaregiversHumansReferral and ConsultationSocial SupportAssistive technologyChronic diseaseOlder peoplePostphenomenologyQualitative case studyReassuranceSociomaterial

Identifiers

PMID34799181
PMCPMC8783048

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.