Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34800892›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2022

The female reproductive tract virome: understanding the dynamic role of viruses in gynecological health and disease.

Ferralita S Madere, Cynthia L Monaco

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Influence of cervicovaginal microbiota onMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ferralita S MadereDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, USA.
Cynthia L MonacoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: Cynthia_Monaco@URMC.Rochester.edu.
University of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Training in HIV Replication and PathogenesisT32AI049815 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WEDEKIND, JOSEPH E · 2001 to 2020
$3.5M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI049815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human body is inhabited by a large and complex network of commensal and predatory eukaryotic viruses and bacteriophages collectively termed the virome. Despite being the most abundant and genetically diverse biological entities on the planet, the impact of viruses on human health especially within the female reproductive tract (FRT) remains understudied. To better appreciate current knowledge regarding the dynamic role of viruses in FRT health and disease, in this review we highlight the known constituents of the FRT virome, transkingdom interactions within the FRT and their influence on gynecological disease. A better understanding of the FRT virome may pave the way toward improved outcomes in gynecological, reproductive, and neonatal health.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesMicrobiotaVirusesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornSymbiosisVirome

Identifiers

PMID34800892
PMCPMC8844092
OpenAlexW3216740638

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.