Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34812430›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2022

A cardiovascular clinic patients' survey to assess challenges and opportunities of digital health adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Lilas Dagher, Saihariharan Nedunchezhian, Abdel Hadi El Hajjar, Yichi Zhang, Orlando Deffer, Ashley Russell, Christopher Pottle, Nassir Marrouche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lilas DagherTulane Research Innovation and Arrhythmia Discoveries-TRIAD Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Saihariharan NedunchezhianTulane Research Innovation and Arrhythmia Discoveries-TRIAD Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Abdel Hadi El HajjarTulane Research Innovation and Arrhythmia Discoveries-TRIAD Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Yichi ZhangTulane Research Innovation and Arrhythmia Discoveries-TRIAD Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Orlando DefferTulane Research Innovation and Arrhythmia Discoveries-TRIAD Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Ashley RussellTulane Research Innovation and Arrhythmia Discoveries-TRIAD Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Christopher PottleTulane Research Innovation and Arrhythmia Discoveries-TRIAD Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Nassir MarroucheTulane Research Innovation and Arrhythmia Discoveries-TRIAD Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 boosted healthcare digitalization and personalization in cardiology. However, understanding patient attitudes and engagement behaviors is essential to achieve successful acceptance and implementation of digital health technologies in personalized care.

objectiveThis study aims to understand current and future trends in wearable device and telemedicine use in the cardiology clinic patient population, recognize patients' attitude towards digital health before and after COVID-19, and identify potential socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in adoption of digital health tools in a New Orleans patient population.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was distributed to Tulane Cardiology Clinic patients between September 2020 and January 2021. Basic demographic information, medical comorbidities, device usage, and opinions on digital health tools were collected.

resultsSurvey responses from 299 participants (average age = 54 years, 50.8% female, 24.4% African American) showed that digital health use was more prevalent in younger, healthier, and more educated individuals. Wearable use was also higher among White patients compared to African American patients. Patients cited costs and technology knowledge as primary deterrents for using wearables, despite being more inclined to use wearables for disease monitoring (41%). While wearable use did not increase after COVID-19 (36.6% pre-COVID vs 35.4% post-COVID,

conclusionDemographic and socioeconomic disparities negatively impact wearable health device and telemedicine adoption within cardiovascular clinic patients. Although telemedicine use increased after COVID-19, this effect was not observed for wearables, reflecting significant economic and digital literacy challenges underlying wearable acceptance.

Indexed as

CardiologyCOVID-19DisparitiesTelemedicineWearables

Identifiers

PMID34812430
PMCPMC8600804

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.