ArticleChemistry & biodiversity2022
Computational Prediction of the Potential Target of SARS-CoV-2 Inhibitor Plitidepsin via Molecular Docking, Dynamic Simulations and MM-PBSA Calculations.
Article in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Modeling and MM-PBSA-Based Molecular Dynamics Investigation of Unexplored tRNA Isoleucine Lysidine Synthetase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis with Hyperbranched Amoxicilloyl-Poly-L-Lysine.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- The Potential Roles ofCurrent computer-aided drug design · 2024Article
- Computational Prediction of the Potential Target of SARS-CoV-2 Inhibitor Plitidepsin via Molecular Docking, Dynamic Simulations and MM-PBSA Calculations.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication depends on the interaction between the viral proteins and the human translation machinery. The cytotoxic peptide plitidepsin was found to inhibit CoV-2 up to 90 % at a concentration of 0.88 nM. In vitro studies suggest that this activity may be attributed to the inhibition of the eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1A (eEF1A). However, recent reports raised the potential for other cellular targets which plitidepsin may use to exert its potent antiviral activity. The lack of data about these potential targets represents a major limitation for its structural optimization. This work describes the use of a molecular modeling approach to rationalize the in vitro antiviral activity of plitidepsin and to identify potential cellular targets. The developed protocol involves an initial molecular docking step followed by molecular dynamics and binding free energy calculations. The results reveal the potential for plitidepsin to bind to the active site of the key enzyme SARS-CoV-2 RdRp. The results also highlight the importance of van der Waals interactions for proper binding with the enzyme. We believe that the results presented in this study could provide the grounds for the optimization of plitidepsin analogs as SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.