Evidence mapPaperPMID 34818229Full record

SynthesisObesity facts2022

Psychological Aspects of Treatment with Intragastric Balloon for Management of Obesity: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Giada Pietrabissa, Vanessa Bertuzzi, Susan Simpson, Anna Guerrini Usubini, Roberto Cattivelli, Simona Bertoli, Enrico Mozzi, Giancarlo Roviaro, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Enrico Molinari

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity facts, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Giada PietrabissaDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy, giada.pietrabissa@unicatt.it.
Vanessa BertuzziDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Susan SimpsonDepartment of Justice and Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Anna Guerrini UsubiniDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Roberto CattivelliDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Simona BertoliDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Obesity Unit and Laboratory of Nutrition and Obesity Research, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Enrico MozziDivision of General Surgery, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giancarlo RoviaroDivision of General Surgery, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca CastelnuovoDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Enrico MolinariDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITNHS Lothian · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOptimizing maintenance of weight loss for people with obesity following intragastric balloon (IGB) therapy hinges on the degree to which health care providers can recognize both the impact of emotional problems and mood difficulties on their capacity to self-manage, and requirements for additional support. However, there is limited research on the psychological correlates of IGB therapy. This systematic review, for the first time, attempts to identify and synthesize the empirical evidence for the reciprocal influence between psychological variables and IGB outcomes.

methodsA literature search was performed in the PubMed, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed using rigorous inclusion criteria and screening by at least 2 reviewers. The selected articles were assessed for quality using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. Data were extracted to address the review aims and presented as a narrative synthesis. The review protocol was preregistered (Prospero CRD42019121291).

resultsA total of 16,179 titles, 14,369 abstracts, and 51 full-text articles were screened, of which 16 studies were included. Findings suggest that female gender, older age, basic educational level, and single/divorced civil status, together with lower levels of depression, binge eating, higher perceived quality of life, and motivation to change were predictors of enhanced IGB treatment outcomes. Dissatisfaction with treatment was higher in those with impaired obesity-related social-life difficulties. The IGB treatment was effective in reducing weight and improving depression, anxiety, eating disorder symptoms, and the overall life quality of patients with obesity - mainly within 6 months from the device positioning and in conjunction with conventional therapies. DISCUSSION/

conclusionIn line with the available literature on obesity and bariatric surgery interventions, poor mental health appears to be an important barrier for successful weight loss among patients with obesity undergoing IGB treatment. In order to improve the efficacy and effectiveness of the IGB therapy, more comprehensive and standardized studies are needed to provide insight into the psychological mechanisms maintaining weight management issues.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BalloonFemaleHumansObesityQuality of LifeWeight LossClinical psychologyIntragastric balloonMood disordersObesityQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID34818229
PMCPMC8820150
OpenAlexW3214895313

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.