ArticleBMC biology2021
Predicting the hosts of prokaryotic viruses using GCN-based semi-supervised learning.
Article in BMC biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Precision phage therapy in the AI/ML era: a systematic review of discovery-to-clinical translation evidence.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- From genomic signals to prediction tools: a critical feature analysis and rigorous benchmark for phage-host prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Pooled it
- Advances in phage-host interaction prediction: in silico method enhances the development of phage therapies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Pooled it
- Antimicrobial resistance crisis: could artificial intelligence be the solution?Military Medical Research · 2024Pooled it
- Phylogeny-agnostic strain-level prediction of phage-host interactions from genomes using machine learning.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Bacteriophage Research: A New Chapter in Future Medicine.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Phage bioinformatics tools: a review of computational approaches for bacteriophage research.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- DNA viruses are constrained to ecological niches and share similar environmental adaptations with hosts.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Identifying host-specific patterns in viral protein sequences to predict host spillover risk in animal and plant kingdoms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- High-resolution phage-host assignment through key proteins using large language models.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Predicting inter-microbial host specificity in oral biofilms using a lightweight relation-aware knowledge graph model.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- PBIP: a deep learning framework for predicting phage-bacterium interactions at the strain level.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Engineering Phages to Fight Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- Article
- Evaluating phage lytic activity: from plaque assays to single-cell technologies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- PHIStruct: improving phage-host interaction prediction at low sequence similarity settings using structure-aware protein embeddings.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A novel framework for phage-host prediction via logical probability theory and network sparsification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Predicting phage-host interactions via feature augmentation and regional graph convolution.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- PHPGAT: predicting phage hosts based on multimodal heterogeneous knowledge graph with graph attention network.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Viromic and Metagenomic Analyses of Commercial Spirulina Fermentations Reveal Remarkable Microbial Diversity.Viruses · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProkaryotic viruses, which infect bacteria and archaea, are the most abundant and diverse biological entities in the biosphere. To understand their regulatory roles in various ecosystems and to harness the potential of bacteriophages for use in therapy, more knowledge of viral-host relationships is required. High-throughput sequencing and its application to the microbiome have offered new opportunities for computational approaches for predicting which hosts particular viruses can infect. However, there are two main challenges for computational host prediction. First, the empirically known virus-host relationships are very limited. Second, although sequence similarity between viruses and their prokaryote hosts have been used as a major feature for host prediction, the alignment is either missing or ambiguous in many cases. Thus, there is still a need to improve the accuracy of host prediction.
resultsIn this work, we present a semi-supervised learning model, named HostG, to conduct host prediction for novel viruses. We construct a knowledge graph by utilizing both virus-virus protein similarity and virus-host DNA sequence similarity. Then graph convolutional network (GCN) is adopted to exploit viruses with or without known hosts in training to enhance the learning ability. During the GCN training, we minimize the expected calibrated error (ECE) to ensure the confidence of the predictions. We tested HostG on both simulated and real sequencing data and compared its performance with other state-of-the-art methods specifically designed for virus host classification (VHM-net, WIsH, PHP, HoPhage, RaFAH, vHULK, and VPF-Class).
conclusionHostG outperforms other popular methods, demonstrating the efficacy of using a GCN-based semi-supervised learning approach. A particular advantage of HostG is its ability to predict hosts from new taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.