ReviewFrontiers in physiology2021
A Systematic Review Examining the Approaches Used to Estimate Interindividual Differences in Trainability and Classify Individual Responses to Exercise Training.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Correlations Between Training Load Parameters and Physical Performance Adaptations in Team Sports: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports medicine - open · 2025Pooled it
- Standard Deviation of Individual Response for VOSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Pooled it
- Heavy resistance exercise training in older men: A responder and inter-individual variability analysis.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Baseline Oral Microbiota Richness Is Associated with Training-Induced Improvements in Relative Handgrip Strength in Older Adults.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Aerobic Exercise Response Variation and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults with Coronary Heart Disease: An SDir Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Muscle quality index and phase angle responses to matched-volume resistance training at different frequencies in older women.Physical activity and nutrition · 2026Article
- Training-Fuel Coupling (TFC): A Molecular Sports Nutrition Framework for Energy Availability, Chrono-Nutrition, and Performance Optimization.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Adolescents' Responses to High-Intensity Versus Standard Physical Education on Body Fat, Blood Pressure, and VOHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of adaptations to four weeks of continuous hypoxic training between healthy men with lower and higher initial aerobic fitness.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Responder signatures and predictors of upper- and lower-limb power responsiveness to maximal strength versus plyometric dry-land training in swimmers.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Inter-Individual Heterogeneity in Aerobic Training Adaptations: Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Personalized Exercise Prescription.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Concerns regarding the standard deviation of individual responses for assessing treatment response heterogeneity.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2025Review
- Effects of a 5-Day Back Squat Overreaching Protocol on Strength Performance, Perceived Recovery and Wellness Responses: A Pilot Trial.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Inter-individual variability in performance benefits from repeated sprint training in hypoxia and associated training parameters.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- How fast-and-frugal trees can inform diagnostic and intervention decisions for enhancing elite athlete performance.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Responsiveness of functional performance and muscle strength, power, and size to resistance training: A systematic review.Sports medicine and health science · 2024Review
- Article
- Evidence-based exercise recommendations to improve functional mobility in older adults - A study protocol for living systematic review and meta-analysis.Open research Europe · 2024Article
- Frequentist, Bayesian Analysis and Complementary Statistical Tools for Geriatric and Rehabilitation Fields: Are Traditional Null-Hypothesis Significance Testing Methods Sufficient?Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.