Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34822084›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Investigating fish contamination scenario and community willingness to adopt consumption advice proposing an advisory option.

Lubna Alam, Ussif Rashid Sumaila, Md Azizul Bari, Ibnu Rusydy, Mohamed Saiyad Musthafa, Mazlin Mokhtar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Lubna AlamInstitute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. lubna@ukm.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0910-2391
Ussif Rashid SumailaInstitute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Md Azizul BariInstitute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Ibnu RusydyDepartment of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Mohamed Saiyad MusthafaUnit of Research in Radiation Biology & Environmental Radioactivity, P.G. & Research, Department of Zoology, The New College (Autonomous), Affiliated to University of Madras, Chennai, 600 014, India.
Mazlin MokhtarInstitute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
National University of Malaysia · MYFisheries and Oceans Canada · CAUniversitas Syiah Kuala · IDUniversity of Madras · IN

Funding

ministry of higher education, malaysia TRGS/1/2015/UKM/02/5/2start, global change system for analysis, research, and training PARR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumption advice to ensure the health and safety of fish consumers remains urgent to handle the ever-increasing panic over heavy metal toxicity. Moreover, studies of fish consumption rarely focus on the perceptions and awareness of consumers. Considering this, the present study examines the factors determining the willingness to follow fish consumption advice as well as calculate the risk-benefit ratio and produce the vulnerability map followed by formulating fish consumption advice for consumers of two commercially important fish species, tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and mudfish (Ophiocephalus striatus), in the Laguna de Bay area of the Philippines. Primary data on consumers' perceptions were collected through a questionnaire, whereas heavy metal contamination data were compiled from the best available literature. We concluded that people's willingness to adopt consumption advice is mostly dependent on their existing level of fish consumption (P = 0.000). There was no discernible difference in the mean concentration of heavy metals in fish between the dry and wet seasons, with the exception of As concentrations in the samples (t15.75 = 3.72, p < 0.001). The hazard quotient (risk-benefit ratio) for fish consumption (HQefa) was an order of magnitude higher in the mudfish samples (0.05 and 28.28) compared to tilapia (0.04 to 16.02). Binangonan and Taguig from the Northern West Bay (1A, 1B) were clearly recognised on the vulnerability map as the most vulnerable regions in the lake. In general, it was determined that As and Pb were the elements causing consumption restrictions on tilapia collected from various parts of Laguna Lake. As with tilapia, locations with a high-risk advisory for mudfish were identified as the Northern West Bay and Central Bay, with a consumption limit of five meals per month due to excessive mercury pollution. This empirical study can serve as an option for the future development of fish consumption advice in the region.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavyTilapiaWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringFishesFood ContaminationHumansLakesRisk AssessmentMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental pollutionHealth riskHeavy metalsRisk–benefit ratioVulnerability

Identifiers

PMID34822084
OpenAlexW3215957173

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.