Evidence mapPaperPMID 34824591Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021

Test-Retest Reliability of the Coronary Heart Disease Damp Phlegm and Blood Stasis Pattern Questionnaire: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Ge Fang, Yaxin Wang, Zhenqian Yan, Xiaowen Zhou, Xingyu Fan, Xiaoqian Liao, Zhixi Hu, Xiantao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ge FangCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6156-0947
Yaxin WangSchool of Basic Medical Science, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8275-9410
Zhenqian YanSchool of Basic Medical Science, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1010-6576
Xiaowen ZhouSchool of Basic Medical Science, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6401-1743
Xingyu FanCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-3746
Xiaoqian LiaoCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9127-9526
Zhixi HuInstitute of Chinese Medicine Diagnosis, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2316-8645
Xiantao LiSchool of Basic Medical Science, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6703-6698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDamp phlegm and blood stasis pattern (DPBSP) is the main pattern in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. To quantify and standardize the diagnosis of DPBSP, questionnaires are usually administered. The CHD Damp Phlegm and Blood Stasis Pattern Questionnaire (CHD-DPBSPQ) is the standard metric for measuring CHD-DPBSP signs and symptoms in practice and clinical research. The CHD-DPBSPQ has moderate diagnostic efficiency, as evidenced by its receiver operating characteristic curves. Furthermore, and high reliability and validity have been shown in some studies but not in a multicenter clinical trial. Our purpose was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a proprietary CHD-DPBSPQ.

methodsThe CHD-DPBSPQ uses a standard procedure for measuring symptoms. The (interrater) reliability and validity of this questionnaire have been previously studied. Here, we evaluated the test interval and weighted kappa value of items of test-retest (intrarater) reliability of the CHD-DPBSPQ. The test-retest reliability was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total CHD-DPBSPQ score and the phlegm domain and blood stasis domain scores. Weighted kappa statistics were calculated for the individual CHD-DPBSPQ items.

resultsUsing the CHD-DPBSPQ, 79 patients with late-stage CHD who were participating in a multicenter clinical trial were assessed twice. The ICCs for the CHD-DPBSPQ score were as follows: 0.827 for the total CHD-DPBSPQ, 0.778 for the phlegm domain score, and 0.828 for the blood stasis domain score. The reliability was slightly better in patients whose test interval was ≤14 days. The weighted kappa values of individual items showed moderate consistency.

conclusionsThe CHD-DPBSPQ was found to have excellent test-retest reliability in this sample of patients.

Identifiers

PMID34824591
PMCPMC8610670

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.