Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34827481›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Differential Cytokine-Induced Responses of Polarized Microglia.

Priyanka Chauhan, Wen S Sheng, Shuxian Hu, Sujata Prasad, James R Lokensgard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Roles of 4'-International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. TheBrain sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Microglia and Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Priyanka ChauhanNeurovirology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Wen S ShengNeurovirology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5425-1185
Shuxian HuNeurovirology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Sujata PrasadNeurovirology Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
James R Lokensgard3-107 Microbiology Research Facility, University of Minnesota, 689 23rd Avenue S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1976-2035
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

T lymphocyte-induced glial activation during CNS immune reconstitution diseaseR01MH066703 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LOKENSGARD, JAMES R · 2003 to 2023
$6.9M
NIMH NIH HHS MH-066703NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of select pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators in driving microglial cell polarization into classically (M1), or alternatively, (M2) activated states, as well as the subsequent differential responses of these induced phenotypes, was examined. Expression of PD-L1, MHC-II, MHC-I, arginase 1 (Arg-1), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) was assessed using multi-color flow cytometry. We observed that both pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators induced PD-L1 expression on non-polarized microglia. Moreover, IFN-γ stimulated significant MHC class I and II expression on these cells. Interestingly, we observed that only IL-4 treatment induced Arg-1 expression, indicating M2 polarization. These M2 cells were refractory to subsequent depolarization and maintained their alternatively activated state. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression was significantly induced on these M2-polarized microglia after treatment with pro-inflammatory mediators, but not anti-inflammatory cytokines. In addition, we observed that only LPS induced iNOS expression in microglial cells, indicating M1 polarization. Furthermore, IFN-γ significantly increased the percentage of M1-polarized microglia expressing iNOS. Surprisingly, when these M1-polarized microglia were treated with either IL-6 or other anti-inflammatory cytokines, they returned to their non-polarized state, as demonstrated by significantly reduced expression of iNOS. Taken together, these results demonstrate differential responses of microglial cells to mediators present in dissimilar microenvironments.

Indexed as

cytokinesmicrogliamicroglial polarizationprogrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)

Identifiers

PMID34827481
PMCPMC8615503
OpenAlexW3213369655

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.