Evidence mapPaperPMID 34828915Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Karol Jerzy Jędrejko, Jan Lazur, Bożena Muszyńska

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Potential uses of silkworm pupae (Frontiers in insect science · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Conservation Crisis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Telomere-to-Telomere Assembly of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Chitosan Nanoparticle-EncapsulatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karol Jerzy JędrejkoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 9 Medyczna Str., 30-688 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5301-2396
Jan LazurDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 9 Medyczna Str., 30-688 Kraków, Poland.
Bożena MuszyńskaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 9 Medyczna Str., 30-688 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5007-1486
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cordyceps spp. mushrooms have a long tradition of use as a natural raw material in Asian ethnomedicine because of their adaptogenic, tonic effects and their ability to reduce fatigue and stimulate the immune system in humans. This review aims to present the chemical composition and medicinal properties of

Indexed as

bioactive compoundsbiological activitiescordycepinCordyceps militarisergothioneinepolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID34828915
PMCPMC8622900
OpenAlexW3210634387

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.