Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830452›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Cervical Carcinoma: Oncobiology and Biomarkers.

Larisa V Volkova, Alexander I Pashov, Nadezhda N Omelchuk

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Assessing telomerase and Ki-67 protein expression in pre-invasive lesions and invasive cervical neoplasia with correlation to clinico-pathological parameters.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Enhanced Tumor-to-Background Contrast with [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Larisa V VolkovaLaboratory of Immunohistochemistry, Pathology and Clinical Diagnostics, Department of Fundamental Medicine, Medical Institute, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 236041 Kaliningrad, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0938-8577
Alexander I PashovDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Institute, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal, 236041 Kaliningrad, Russia.
Nadezhda N OmelchukDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics, Faculty of Continuing Medical Education, People's Friendship University, 117198 Moscow, Russia.
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University · RUPeoples' Friendship University of Russia · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the most common types of carcinomas causing morbidity and mortality in women in all countries of the world. At the moment, the oncology, oncobiology, and oncomorphology of cervical cancer are characterized by the accumulation of new information; various molecular biological, genetic, and immunohistochemical methods of investigation of the mechanisms of cervical carcinogenesis are tested and applied; targeted antitumour drugs and diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers are being searched for. Many issues of the etiopathogenesis of cervical cancer have not been sufficiently studied, and the role of many biomarkers characterizing various stages of cervical carcinogenesis remains unclear. Therefore, the target of this review is to systematize and understand several problems in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer and to evaluate the significance and role of biomarkers in cervical carcinogenesis.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisCarcinoma, Squamous CellCervix UteriFemaleHumansUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkerscarcinoma of the cervixcervical carcinogenesisimmunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID34830452
PMCPMC8624663
OpenAlexW3214873354

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.