Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34830873›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Validation of SFRP1 Promoter Hypermethylation in Plasma as a Prognostic Marker for Survival and Gemcitabine Effectiveness in Patients with Stage IV Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Benjamin Emil Stubbe, Stine Dam Henriksen, Poul Henning Madsen, Anders Christian Larsen, Henrik Bygum Krarup, Inge Søkilde Pedersen, Martin Nygård Johansen, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin Emil StubbeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2727-5915
Stine Dam HenriksenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0286-397X
Poul Henning MadsenClinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Anders Christian LarsenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Henrik Bygum KrarupClinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5294-2428
Inge Søkilde PedersenClinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9902-8040
Martin Nygård JohansenUnit of Clinical Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9790-0985
Ole Thorlacius-UssingDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No reliable predictive blood-based biomarkers are available for determining survival from pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This combined discovery and validation study examines promoter hypermethylation (ph) of secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1) in plasma-derived cell-free DNA as an independent prognostic marker for survival and Gemcitabine effectiveness in patients with stage IV PDAC. We conducted methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction analysis of the promoter region of the SFRP1 gene, based on bisulfite treatment. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox regression. The discovery cohort included 40 patients, 25 receiving Gem. Gem-treated patients with phSFRP1 had a shorter median overall survival (mOS) (4.4 months) than unmethylated patients (11.6 months). Adjusted Cox-regression yielded a hazard rate (HR) of 3.48 (1.39-8.70). The validation cohort included 58 Gem-treated patients. Patients with phSFRP1 had a shorter mOS (3.2 months) than unmethylated patients (6.3 months). Adjusted Cox regression yielded an HR of 3.53 (1.85-6.74). In both cohorts, phSFRP1 was associated with poorer survival in Gem-treated patients. This may indicate that tumors with phSFRP1 are more aggressive and less sensitive to Gem treatment. This knowledge may facilitate tailored treatment of patients with stage IV PDAC. Further studies are planned to examine phSFRP1 in more intensive chemotherapy regimens.

Indexed as

biomarkerblood-basedcancerDNA methylationepigeneticspancreatic cancerpersonalized therapyprognosticsurvival

Identifiers

PMID34830873
PMCPMC8616084
OpenAlexW3213238644

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.