Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831126›Full record

SynthesisCells2021

Assessing Creatine Supplementation for Neuroprotection against Perinatal Hypoxic-Ischaemic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review of Perinatal and Adult Pre-Clinical Studies.

Nhi Thao Tran, Sharmony B Kelly, Rod J Snow, David W Walker, Stacey J Ellery, Robert Galinsky

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Creatine in women's health: bridging the gap from menstruation through pregnancy to menopause.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nhi Thao TranSchool of Health & Biomedical Sciences, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0396-9760
Sharmony B KellyThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne 3168, Australia.
Rod J SnowInstitute for Physical Activity & Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne 3125, Australia.
David W WalkerSchool of Health & Biomedical Sciences, STEM College, RMIT University, Melbourne 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4958-6140
Stacey J ElleryThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3769-1960
Robert GalinskyThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6374-9372
Hudson Institute of Medical Research · AUDeakin University · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1164954, 1124493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an important unmet need to develop interventions that improve outcomes of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Creatine has emerged as a promising neuroprotective agent. Our objective was to systematically evaluate the preclinical animal studies that used creatine for perinatal neuroprotection, and to identify knowledge gaps that need to be addressed before creatine can be considered for pragmatic clinical trials for HIE.

methodsWe reviewed preclinical studies up to 20 September 2021 using PubMed, EMBASE and OVID MEDLINE databases. The SYRCLE risk of bias assessment tool was utilized.

resultsSeventeen studies were identified. Dietary creatine was the most common administration route. Cerebral creatine loading was age-dependent with near term/term-equivalent studies reporting higher increases in creatine/phosphocreatine compared to adolescent-adult equivalent studies. Most studies did not control for sex, study long-term histological and functional outcomes, or test creatine post-HI. None of the perinatal studies that suggested benefit directly controlled core body temperature (a known confounder) and many did not clearly state controlling for potential study bias.

conclusionCreatine is a promising neuroprotective intervention for HIE. However, this systematic review reveals key knowledge gaps and improvements to preclinical studies that must be addressed before creatine can be trailed for neuroprotection of the human fetus/neonate.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAgingAnimalsCreatineFemaleHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainMaleNeuroprotectionPublication BiasRiskSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsCreatinebrain injurycreatinehypoxic ischaemic encephalopathyneuroprotectionperinatal encephalopathyphosphocreatine

Identifiers

PMID34831126
PMCPMC8616304
OpenAlexW3210996998

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.