Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34831385›Full record

ReviewCells2021

Mechanisms of Plasticity in Subcortical Visual Areas.

Maël Duménieu, Béatrice Marquèze-Pouey, Michaël Russier, Dominique Debanne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pattern of frustration formation in the functional brain network.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maël DuménieuINSERM, Aix-Marseille Université, UNIS, 13015 Marseille, France.
Béatrice Marquèze-PoueyINSERM, Aix-Marseille Université, UNIS, 13015 Marseille, France.
Michaël RussierINSERM, Aix-Marseille Université, UNIS, 13015 Marseille, France.
Dominique DebanneINSERM, Aix-Marseille Université, UNIS, 13015 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8581-5695

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-17-CE16-022-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-21-CE16-XXX-01Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale DEQ-20180839583Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale DVS-20131228768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual plasticity is classically considered to occur essentially in the primary and secondary cortical areas. Subcortical visual areas such as the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) or the superior colliculus (SC) have long been held as basic structures responsible for a stable and defined function. In this model, the dLGN was considered as a relay of visual information travelling from the retina to cortical areas and the SC as a sensory integrator orienting body movements towards visual targets. However, recent findings suggest that both dLGN and SC neurons express functional plasticity, adding unexplored layers of complexity to their previously attributed functions. The existence of neuronal plasticity at the level of visual subcortical areas redefines our approach of the visual system. The aim of this paper is therefore to review the cellular and molecular mechanisms for activity-dependent plasticity of both synaptic transmission and cellular properties in subcortical visual areas.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexGeniculate BodiesHumansNeuronal PlasticityRetinaSynapsesVisual PathwaysHebbian plasticityhomeostatic plasticityintrinsic plasticitylateral geniculate nucleussuperior colliculussynaptic plasticityvisual system

Identifiers

PMID34831385
PMCPMC8621502

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.