Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34835278›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Development of a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidate Using Plant-Based Manufacturing and a Tobacco Mosaic Virus-like Nano-Particle.

Joshua M Royal, Carrie A Simpson, Alison A McCormick, Amanda Phillips, Steve Hume, Josh Morton, John Shepherd, Youngjun Oh, Kelsi Swope, Jennifer L DeBeauchamp and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Decoration ofInfection and immunity · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua M RoyalKentucky BioProcessing, Inc., Owensboro, KY 42301, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4243-2667
Carrie A SimpsonKentucky BioProcessing, Inc., Owensboro, KY 42301, USA.
Alison A McCormickDepartment of Biological & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Touro University California, Vallejo, CA 95688, USA.
Amanda PhillipsKentucky BioProcessing, Inc., Owensboro, KY 42301, USA.
Steve HumeKentucky BioProcessing, Inc., Owensboro, KY 42301, USA.
Josh MortonKentucky BioProcessing, Inc., Owensboro, KY 42301, USA.
John ShepherdKentucky BioProcessing, Inc., Owensboro, KY 42301, USA.
Youngjun OhKentucky BioProcessing, Inc., Owensboro, KY 42301, USA.
Kelsi SwopeKentucky BioProcessing, Inc., Owensboro, KY 42301, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1085-0319
Jennifer L DeBeauchampDepartment of Infectious Disease, St. Jude Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
Richard J WebbyDepartment of Infectious Disease, St. Jude Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4397-7132
Robert W CrossGalveston National Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7718-1522
Viktoriya BorisevichGalveston National Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA.
Thomas W GeisbertGalveston National Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA.
Jennifer K DemarcoCenter for Predictive Medicine for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Barry BratcherKentucky BioProcessing, Inc., Owensboro, KY 42301, USA.
Hugh HaydonKentucky BioProcessing, Inc., Owensboro, KY 42301, USA.
Gregory P PogueKentucky BioProcessing, Inc., Owensboro, KY 42301, USA.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USTouro University California · USUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stable, effective, easy-to-manufacture vaccines are critical to stopping the COVID-19 pandemic resulting from the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. We constructed a vaccine candidate CoV-RBD121-NP, which is comprised of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike glycoprotein (S) fused to a human IgG1 Fc domain (CoV-RBD121) and conjugated to a modified tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) nanoparticle. In vitro, CoV-RBD121 bound to the host virus receptor ACE2 and to the monoclonal antibody CR3022, a neutralizing antibody that blocks S binding to ACE2. The CoV-RBD121-NP vaccine candidate retained key SARS-CoV-2 spike protein epitopes, had consistent manufacturing release properties of safety, identity, and strength, and displayed stable potency when stored for 12 months at 2-8 °C or 22-28 °C. Immunogenicity studies revealed strong antibody responses in C57BL/6 mice with non-adjuvanted or adjuvanted (7909 CpG) formulations. The non-adjuvanted vaccine induced a balanced Th1/Th2 response and antibodies that recognized both the S1 domain and full S protein from SARS2-CoV-2, whereas the adjuvanted vaccine induced a Th1-biased response. Both adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccines induced virus neutralizing titers as measured by three different assays. Collectively, these data showed the production of a stable candidate vaccine for COVID-19 through the association of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD with the TMV-like nanoparticle.

Indexed as

nanoparticleplant-based manufacturingreceptor-binding domainSARS-CoV-2 vaccine

Identifiers

PMID34835278
PMCPMC8619098
OpenAlexW3212860825

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.