Evidence mapPaperPMID 34836306Full record

ReviewNutrients2021

AMPK Activity: A Primary Target for Diabetes Prevention with Therapeutic Phytochemicals.

Min-Yu Chung, Hyo-Kyoung Choi, Jin-Taek Hwang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insulin Resistance and Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chinese herbal medicines · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Min-Yu ChungPersonalized Diet Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Jeonju 55365, Korea.
Hyo-Kyoung ChoiPersonalized Diet Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Jeonju 55365, Korea.
Jin-Taek HwangPersonalized Diet Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Jeonju 55365, Korea.
Korea Food Research Institute · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is a metabolic syndrome characterized by inadequate blood glucose control and is associated with reduced quality of life and various complications, significantly shortening life expectancy. Natural phytochemicals found in plants have been traditionally used as medicines for the prevention of chronic diseases including diabetes in East Asia since ancient times. Many of these phytochemicals have been characterized as having few side effects, and scientific research into the mechanisms of action responsible has accumulated mounting evidence for their efficacy. These compounds, which may help to prevent metabolic syndrome disorders including diabetes, act through relevant intracellular signaling pathways. In this review, we examine the anti-diabetic efficacy of several compounds and extracts derived from medicinal plants, with a focus on AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity.

Indexed as

AMP-Activated Protein KinasesAnimalsDiabetes MellitusFood IngredientsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMetabolic DiseasesPhytochemicalsPlants, MedicinalQuality of LifeAMP-Activated Protein KinasesFood IngredientsHypoglycemic AgentsPhytochemicalsAMP-activated protein kinasediabetesingredientmedicinal plants

Identifiers

PMID34836306
PMCPMC8621568
OpenAlexW3213932487

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.