Evidence mapPaperPMID 34836341Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Content Validation of a Chrononutrition Questionnaire for the General and Shift Work Populations: A Delphi Study.

Yan Yin Phoi, Maxine P Bonham, Michelle Rogers, Jillian Dorrian, Alison M Coates

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yan Yin PhoiUniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-311X
Maxine P BonhamDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4854-1581
Michelle RogersAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA) Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0205-2528
Jillian DorrianUniSA Justice and Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6485-1643
Alison M CoatesUniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1031-2545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unusual meal timing has been associated with a higher prevalence of chronic disease. Those at greater risk include shift workers and evening chronotypes. This study aimed to validate the content of a Chrononutrition Questionnaire for shift and non-shift workers to identify temporal patterns of eating in relation to chronotype. Content validity was determined using a Delphi study of three rounds. Experts rated the relevance of, and provided feedback on, 46 items across seven outcomes: meal regularity, times of first eating occasion, last eating occasion, largest meal, main meals/snacks, wake, and sleep, which were edited in response. Items with greater than 70% consensus of relevance were accepted. Rounds one, two, and three had 28, 26, and 24 experts, respectively. Across three rounds, no outcomes were irrelevant, but seven were merged into three for ease of usage, and two sections were added for experts to rate and comment on. In the final round, all but one of 29 items achieved greater than 70% consensus of relevance with no further changes. The Chrononutrition Questionnaire was deemed relevant to experts in circadian biology and chrononutrition, and could represent a convenient tool to assess temporal patterns of eating in relation to chronotype in future studies.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentAdultAgedChronobiology DisciplineCircadian RhythmDelphi TechniqueEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMealsMiddle AgedNutritional SciencesReproducibility of ResultsShift Work Schedulechronotypecircadian rhythmmeal regularitymeal timingnutrition assessmentquestionnaire developmenttemporal meal patterns

Identifiers

PMID34836341
PMCPMC8620673

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.