Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34836398›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Beliefs and Norms Associated with the Use of Ultra-Processed Commercial Milk Formulas for Pregnant Women in Vietnam.

Tuan T Nguyen, Jennifer Cashin, Constance Ching, Phillip Baker, Hoang T Tran, Amy Weissman, Thao T Nguyen, Roger Mathisen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tuan T NguyenAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Hanoi 11022, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-0737-430X
Jennifer CashinAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Hanoi 11022, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-8290-7906
Constance ChingAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Hanoi 11022, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-7006-9498
Phillip BakerInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0802-2349
Hoang T TranNeonatal Unit and Human Milk Bank, Da Nang Hospital for Women and Children, Da Nang 50506, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-7729-6063
Amy WeissmanAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Hanoi 11022, Vietnam.
Thao T NguyenSchool of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi 11615, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-1667-155X
Roger MathisenAlive & Thrive Southeast Asia, FHI 360, Hanoi 11022, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-4475-8716
Hanoi University of Science and Technology · VNDa Nang Hospital · VNDeakin University · AUUNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office · TH

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP50838Irish Aid NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commercial milk formula for pregnant women (CMF-PW) is an expensive, ultra-processed food with a high concentration of sugar, the consumption of which may be linked to negative health outcomes. However, CMF-PWs are promoted as beneficial for pregnant women and lactating mothers as well as their children. To date, little is known about the factors associated with the use of CMF-PW among pregnant women. We performed this analysis to examine the association between the use of CMF-PW and related beliefs and norms among pregnant women in Vietnam. We interviewed 268 pregnant women in their second and third trimesters from two provinces and one municipality representing diverse communities in Vietnam. Multinomial (polytomous) logistic regression, structural equation modeling (SEM), and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis were used to examine associations between beliefs and social norms related to CMF-PW and reported consumption, characterized as occasional, recent, and never during the current pregnancy. Overall, 64.6% of pregnant women reported using CMF-PW during the current pregnancy and 34.7% consumed CMF-PW on the day prior to the interview. Strong beliefs that CMF-PW will make a child smart and healthy (53.7%) and the perception that use of CMF-PW is common (70.9%) were associated with increased use on the previous day (beliefs: aOR: 3.56; 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): 1.65, 7.71;

Indexed as

Drinking BehaviorCultureDiet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisLogistic ModelsMilk SubstitutesPregnancyPregnant PeoplePropensity ScoreSocial NormsVietnambreastfeedingbreastmilk substitutescode of marketing of breast-milk substitutescommercial milk formula (CMF)conflict of interestinfantnutritionpregnant womenVietnam

Identifiers

PMID34836398
PMCPMC8621914
OpenAlexW3215039103

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.