Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34838084›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2021

Antinociceptive and analgesic effect of continuous intravenous infusion of maropitant, lidocaine and ketamine alone or in combination in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

Janaina Maria Xavier Corrêa, Raquel Vieira Niella, Jéssica Natália Silva de Oliveira, Alex Costa Silva Junior, Claire Souza da Costa Marques, Taísa Miranda Pinto, Elisângela Barboza da Silva, Suzane Lilian Beier, Fabiana Lessa Silva, Mário Sérgio Lima de Lavor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janaina Maria Xavier CorrêaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Km 16, Rodovia Jorge Amado, Ilhéus, Bahia, CEP- 45662-900, Brazil. janainaxaviercorrea@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9833-0574
Raquel Vieira NiellaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Km 16, Rodovia Jorge Amado, Ilhéus, Bahia, CEP- 45662-900, Brazil.
Jéssica Natália Silva de OliveiraDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Km 16, Rodovia Jorge Amado, Ilhéus, Bahia, CEP- 45662-900, Brazil.
Alex Costa Silva JuniorDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Km 16, Rodovia Jorge Amado, Ilhéus, Bahia, CEP- 45662-900, Brazil.
Claire Souza da Costa MarquesDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Km 16, Rodovia Jorge Amado, Ilhéus, Bahia, CEP- 45662-900, Brazil.
Taísa Miranda PintoDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Km 16, Rodovia Jorge Amado, Ilhéus, Bahia, CEP- 45662-900, Brazil.
Elisângela Barboza da SilvaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Km 16, Rodovia Jorge Amado, Ilhéus, Bahia, CEP- 45662-900, Brazil.
Suzane Lilian BeierSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Campus Pampulha of Federal University of Minas Gerais, Avenue Antônio Carlos, 6627, mailbox 567, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Fabiana Lessa SilvaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Km 16, Rodovia Jorge Amado, Ilhéus, Bahia, CEP- 45662-900, Brazil.
Mário Sérgio Lima de LavorDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Km 16, Rodovia Jorge Amado, Ilhéus, Bahia, CEP- 45662-900, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultimodal analgesia consists of the combination of analgesic drugs at low doses to act in different places along the path of pain. Studies with continuous infusion of analgesic drugs in cats are not common. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of maropitant, lidocaine and ketamine alone or in combination (intravenous bolus + subsequent continuous intravenous infusion) in the management of acute postoperative pain in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Seventy healthy cats undergoing an ovariohysterectomy received a standard anesthetic protocol consisting of acepromazine and morphine, propofol (anesthesia induction), and isoflurane (anesthesia maintenance). The animals were stratified into seven groups (n = 10 in each group): control (CG), maropitant (MG), lidocaine (LG), ketamine (KG), maropitant + lidocaine (LMG), maropitant + ketamine (KMG), and maropitant + lidocaine + ketamine (LKMG). All drugs were injected first as an intravenous bolus and then by continuous intravenous infusion. During surgery, esophageal temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, oxygen saturation, expired isoflurane concentration, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide at the end of expiration were evaluated at 7 time points. Postoperative pain was evaluated for 6 h after extubation using the visual analogue scale and the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cats.

resultsAdverse effects related to maropitant, lidocaine and ketamine infusion were not observed. Pain scores were lower in the MG, KG and LG groups when compared to the CG group using both scales. Although pain scores were also lower in all combination groups than CG, more animals in these groups required rescue analgesia compared to MG. This indicates that the postoperative analgesic effect of all drugs, either alone or in combination, confers analgesia, although the combinations did not promote greater analgesia.

conclusionsContinuous intravenous infusion of maropitant, lidocaine, and ketamine alone induces postoperative analgesic effect in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy, but combinations of these drugs did not increase the analgesic effect. No adverse effect was observed with any drug or their combination.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesKetamineAnalgesicsAnimalsCatsFemaleInfusions, IntravenousLidocaineOvariectomyPostoperative PainQuinuclidinesAnalgesicsKetamineLidocainemaropitantQuinuclidinesNeurokinin 1NK1 receptor antagonistN-methyl-D-aspartatePainSodium channels

Identifiers

PMID34838084
PMCPMC8626950
OpenAlexW3217289462

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.