Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34838140›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2021

Chemical toxicity prediction based on semi-supervised learning and graph convolutional neural network.

Jiarui Chen, Yain-Whar Si, Chon-Wai Un, Shirley W I Siu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI/ML-based computational models for toxicity prediction.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Beyond QSARs: Quantitative Knowledge-Activity Relationships (QKARs) for enhanced drug toxicity prediction.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Qsarna: An Online Tool for Smart Chemical Space Navigation in Drug Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Machine Learned Classification of Ligand Intrinsic Activities at HumanbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. VenomPred 2.0: A NovelJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review of machine learning and deep learning models for toxicity prediction.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiarui ChenDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, 999078, Macau, China.
Yain-Whar SiDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, 999078, Macau, China.
Chon-Wai UnDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, 999078, Macau, China.
Shirley W I SiuDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, 999078, Macau, China. shirleysiu@um.edu.mo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3695-7758

Funding

universidade de macau MYRG2019-00098-FST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As safety is one of the most important properties of drugs, chemical toxicology prediction has received increasing attentions in the drug discovery research. Traditionally, researchers rely on in vitro and in vivo experiments to test the toxicity of chemical compounds. However, not only are these experiments time consuming and costly, but experiments that involve animal testing are increasingly subject to ethical concerns. While traditional machine learning (ML) methods have been used in the field with some success, the limited availability of annotated toxicity data is the major hurdle for further improving model performance. Inspired by the success of semi-supervised learning (SSL) algorithms, we propose a Graph Convolution Neural Network (GCN) to predict chemical toxicity and trained the network by the Mean Teacher (MT) SSL algorithm. Using the Tox21 data, our optimal SSL-GCN models for predicting the twelve toxicological endpoints achieve an average ROC-AUC score of 0.757 in the test set, which is a 6% improvement over GCN models trained by supervised learning and conventional ML methods. Our SSL-GCN models also exhibit superior performance when compared to models constructed using the built-in DeepChem ML methods. This study demonstrates that SSL can increase the prediction power of models by learning from unannotated data. The optimal unannotated to annotated data ratio ranges between 1:1 and 4:1. This study demonstrates the success of SSL in chemical toxicity prediction; the same technique is expected to be beneficial to other chemical property prediction tasks by utilizing existing large chemical databases. Our optimal model SSL-GCN is hosted on an online server accessible through: https://app.cbbio.online/ssl-gcn/home .

Indexed as

ADMETChemical toxicityDeep learningGraph convolutional neural networkMean teacherSemi-supervised learningTox21

Identifiers

PMID34838140
PMCPMC8627024

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.