Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34838149›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2021

Impact of early-life rearing history on gut microbiome succession and performance of Nile tilapia.

Yale Deng, Fotini Kokou, Ep H Eding, Marc C J Verdegem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Effect ofAquaculture nutrition · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A novel gnotobiotic experimental system for Atlantic salmon (Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yale DengAquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Fotini KokouAquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. fotini.kokou@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3675-3835
Ep H EdingAquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Marc C J VerdegemAquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

china scholarship council 201606320215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFish gut microbial colonisation starts during larval stage and plays an important role in host's growth and health. To what extent first colonisation could influence the gut microbiome succession and growth in later life remains unknown. In this study, Nile tilapia embryos were incubated in two different environments, a flow-through system (FTS) and a biofloc system (BFS); hatched larvae were subsequently cultured in the systems for 14 days of feeding (dof). Fish were then transferred to one common recirculating aquaculture system (RAS1, common garden, 15-62 dof), followed by a growth trial in another RAS (RAS2, growth trial, 63-105 dof). In RAS2, fish were fed with two types of diet, differing in non-starch polysaccharide content. Our aim was to test the effect of rearing environment on the gut microbiome development, nutrient digestibility and growth performance of Nile tilapia during post-larvae stages.

resultsLarvae cultured in the BFS showed better growth and different gut microbiome, compared to FTS. After the common garden, the gut microbiome still showed differences in species composition, while body weight was similar. Long-term effects of early life rearing history on fish gut microbiome composition, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen and energy balances were not observed. Still, BFS-reared fish had more gut microbial interactions than FTS-reared fish. A temporal effect was observed in gut microbiome succession during fish development, although a distinct number of core microbiome remained present throughout the experimental period.

conclusionOur results indicated that the legacy effect of first microbial colonisation of the fish gut gradually disappeared during host development, with no differences in gut microbiome composition and growth performance observed in later life after culture in a common environment. However, early life exposure of larvae to biofloc consistently increased the microbial interactions in the gut of juvenile Nile tilapia and might possibly benefit gut health.

Indexed as

Biofloc systemFlow-through systemGrowth performanceLegacy effectMicrobial interactionsNutrient digestibility

Identifiers

PMID34838149
PMCPMC8627003
OpenAlexW3217580926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.