Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34844145›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2022

Wave comparisons of clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 admissions - Exploring the impact of treatment and strain dynamics.

Anna Freeman, Alastair Watson, Paul O'Regan, Oskar Wysocki, Hannah Burke, Andre Freitas, Robert Livingstone, Ahilanadan Dushianthan, Michael Celinski, James Batchelor and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anna FreemanFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. Electronic address: a.freeman@soton.ac.uk.
Alastair WatsonFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Paul O'ReganDigital Experimental Cancer Medicine Team, Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Oskar WysockiDigital Experimental Cancer Medicine Team, Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Hannah BurkeFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Andre FreitasDigital Experimental Cancer Medicine Team, Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Idiap Research Institute, Switzerland.
Robert LivingstoneFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Ahilanadan DushianthanFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Michael CelinskiFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
James BatchelorFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; Clinical Informatics Research Unit Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton,United Kingdom.
Hang PhanFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; Clinical Informatics Research Unit Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton,United Kingdom; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Florina BorcaFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Clinical Informatics Research Unit Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton,United Kingdom; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Paul FitzpatrickDigital Experimental Cancer Medicine Team, Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Donal LandersDigital Experimental Cancer Medicine Team, Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Tom Ma WilkinsonFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDexamethasone has now been incorporated into the standard of care for COVID-19 hospital patients. However, larger intensive care unit studies have failed to show discernible improvements in mortality in the recent wave. We aimed to investigate the impacts of these factors on disease outcomes in a UK hospital study.

methodsThis retrospective observational study reports patient characteristics, interventions and outcomes in COVID-19 patients from a UK teaching hospital; cohort 1, pre 16th June-2020 (pre-dexamethasone); cohort 2, 17th June to 30th November-2020 (post-dexamethasone, pre-VOC 202,012/01 as dominant strain); cohort 3, 1st December-2020 to 3rd March-2021 (during establishment of VOC202012/01 as the dominant strain).

resultsDexamethasone treatment was more common in cohorts 2 and 3 (42.7% and 51.6%) compared with cohort 1 (2.5%). After adjusting for risk, odds of death within 28 days were 2-fold lower in cohort 2 vs 1 (OR:0.47,[0.27,0.79],p = 0.006). Mortality was higher cohort 3 vs 2 (20% vs 14%); but not significantly different to cohort 1 (OR: 0.86,[0.64, 1.15],p = 0.308).

conclusionsThe real world finding of lower mortality following dexamethasone supports the published trial evidence and highlights ongoing need for research with introduction of new treatments and ongoing concern over new COVID-19 variants.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDexamethasoneHospitalizationHospitals, TeachingHumansIntensive Care UnitsSARS-CoV-2United KingdomDexamethasoneCOVID-19 variantsCOVID-19 wavesDexamethasone

Identifiers

PMID34844145
PMCPMC8608665

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.