Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34847193›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Teaming-up nurses with ophthalmologists to expand the reach of eye care in a middle-income country: Validation of health data acquisition by nursing staff in a telemedicine strategy.

Cassia Garcia Moraes Pagano, Tais de Campos Moreira, Daniel Sganzerla, Ana Maria Frölich Matzenbacher, Amanda Gomes Faria, Lucas Matturro, Felipe Cezar Cabral, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki Rados, Anelise Decavata Szortyka, Maicon Falavigna and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Cassia Garcia Moraes PaganoHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5270-1883
Tais de Campos MoreiraHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Daniel SganzerlaHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Ana Maria Frölich MatzenbacherHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Amanda Gomes FariaHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Lucas MatturroHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Felipe Cezar CabralHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Dimitris Rucks Varvaki RadosNúcleo de Telessaúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Anelise Decavata SzortykaNúcleo de Telessaúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Maicon FalavignaHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Maria Eulalia Vinadé ChagasHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3291-3571
Erno HarzheimPrograma de Pós Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Marcelo GonçalvesPrograma de Pós Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Roberto UmpierrePrograma de Pós Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Aline Lutz de AraujoNúcleo de Telessaúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine can be used to conduct ophthalmological assessment of patients, facilitating patient access to specialist care. Since the teleophthalmology models require data collection support from other health professionals, the purpose of our study was to assess agreement between the nursing technician and the ophthalmologist in acquisition of health parameters that can be used for remote analysis as part of a telemedicine strategy. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 140 patients referred to an ophthalmological telediagnosis center by primary healthcare doctors. The health parameters evaluated were visual acuity (VA), objective ophthalmic measures acquired by autorefraction, keratometry, and intraocular pressure (IOP). Bland-Altman plots were used to analyze agreement between the nursing technician and the ophthalmologist. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias equal to zero for the VA measurements [95%-LoA: -0.25-0.25], 0.01 [95%-LoA: -0.86-0.88] for spherical equivalent (M), -0.08 [95%-LoA: -1.1-0.95] for keratometry (K) and -0.23 [95%-LoA: -4.4-4.00] for IOP. The measures had a high linear correlation (R [95%CI]: 0.87 [0.82-0.91]; 0.97 [0.96-0.98]; 0.96 [0.95-0.97] and 0.88 [0.84-0.91] respectively). The results observed demonstrate that remote ophthalmological data collection by adequately trained health professionals is viable. This confirms the utility and safety of these solutions for scenarios in which access to ophthalmologists is limited.

Indexed as

Intraocular PressureNursing StaffOphthalmologistsTelemedicineTonometry, OcularAdultAgedEye DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmologyPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID34847193
PMCPMC8631620

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.