Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849655›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2022

A Higher Antibody Response Is Generated With a 6- to 7-Week (vs Standard) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccine Dosing Interval.

Brian Grunau, Michael Asamoah-Boaheng, Pascal M Lavoie, Mohammad Ehsanul Karim, Tracy L Kirkham, Paul A Demers, Vilte Barakauskas, Ana Citlali Marquez, Agatha N Jassem, Sheila F O'Brien and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. No time for complacency: The CoVaRR-Net Biobank is an essential element of laboratory preparedness for infectious disease outbreaks.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cohort profile:BMJ open · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Brian GrunauCentre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, University of British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4103-1383
Michael Asamoah-BoahengDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Pascal M LavoieDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Mohammad Ehsanul KarimCentre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Tracy L KirkhamDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Paul A DemersSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Vilte BarakauskasDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Ana Citlali MarquezDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Agatha N JassemDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Sheila F O'BrienCanadian, Blood Services Canada.
Steven J DrewsCanadian, Blood Services Canada.
Scott HaigBritish Columbia Emergency Health Services, British Columbia, Canada.
Sheldon CheskesLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute and Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David M GoldfarbDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAIsland Health · CAUniversity of Toronto · CACanadian Blood Services · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal dosing interval for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccines remains controversial. In this prospective study, we compared serology results of paramedics vaccinated with mRNA vaccines at the recommended short (17-28 days) vs long (42-49 days) interval. We found that a long dosing interval resulted in higher spike, receptor binding domain, and spike N terminal domain antibody concentrations.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralAntibody FormationCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansProspective StudiesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2antibodiesCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2spikevaccine

Identifiers

PMID34849655
PMCPMC8690265
OpenAlexW3217514210

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.