Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849844›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

A novel transposable element-based authentication protocol for Drosophila cell lines.

Daniel Mariyappa, Douglas B Rusch, Shunhua Han, Arthur Luhur, Danielle Overton, David F B Miller, Casey M Bergman, Andrew C Zelhof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel MariyappaBiology Department, Drosophila Genomics Resource Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4775-1656
Douglas B RuschBiology Department, Center for Genetics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Shunhua HanDepartment of Genetics and Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8605-7547
Arthur LuhurBiology Department, Drosophila Genomics Resource Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5249-6587
Danielle OvertonBiology Department, Drosophila Genomics Resource Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
David F B MillerBiology Department, Center for Genetics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Casey M BergmanDepartment of Genetics and Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5462-9854
Andrew C ZelhofBiology Department, Drosophila Genomics Resource Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7085-822X

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
DROSOPHILA GENOMICS RESOURCE CENTERP40OD010949 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Zelhof · 2012 to 2026
$9.4M
NIH HHS P40 OD010949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila cell lines are used by researchers to investigate various cell biological phenomena. It is crucial to exercise good cell culture practice. Poor handling can lead to both inter- and intra-species cross-contamination. Prolonged culturing can lead to introduction of large- and small-scale genomic changes. These factors, therefore, make it imperative that methods to authenticate Drosophila cell lines are developed to ensure reproducibility. Mammalian cell line authentication is reliant on short tandem repeat (STR) profiling; however, the relatively low STR mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster at the individual level is likely to preclude the value of this technique. In contrast, transposable elements (TEs) are highly polymorphic among individual flies and abundant in Drosophila cell lines. Therefore, we investigated the utility of TE insertions as markers to discriminate Drosophila cell lines derived from the same or different donor genotypes, divergent sub-lines of the same cell line, and from other insect cell lines. We developed a PCR-based next-generation sequencing protocol to cluster cell lines based on the genome-wide distribution of a limited number of diagnostic TE families. We determined the distribution of five TE families in S2R+, S2-DRSC, S2-DGRC, Kc167, ML-DmBG3-c2, mbn2, CME W1 Cl.8+, and ovarian somatic sheath Drosophila cell lines. Two independent downstream analyses of the next-generation sequencing data yielded similar clustering of these cell lines. Double-blind testing of the protocol reliably identified various Drosophila cell lines. In addition, our data indicate minimal changes with respect to the genome-wide distribution of these five TE families when cells are passaged for at least 50 times. The protocol developed can accurately identify and distinguish the numerous Drosophila cell lines available to the research community, thereby aiding reproducible Drosophila cell culture research.

Indexed as

Cell LineDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophilaAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterGenome, InsectReproducibility of ResultsDNA Transposable Elementsauthenticationcell linesDrosophilatransposable element

Identifiers

PMID34849844
PMCPMC9210319

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.