Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849853›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2021

The Tetragnatha kauaiensis Genome Sheds Light on the Origins of Genomic Novelty in Spiders.

José Cerca, Ellie E Armstrong, Joel Vizueta, Rosa Fernández, Dimitar Dimitrov, Bent Petersen, Stefan Prost, Julio Rozas, Dmitri Petrov, Rosemary G Gillespie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gene and Genome Duplication in Spiders.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

José CercaBerkeley Evolab, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, UC Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7788-4367
Ellie E ArmstrongBerkeley Evolab, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, UC Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7107-6318
Joel VizuetaDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística & Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
Rosa FernándezInstitute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain.
Dimitar DimitrovDepartment of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5830-5702
Bent PetersenSection for Evolutionary Genomics, The GLOBE Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stefan ProstCentral Research Laboratories, Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6229-3596
Julio RozasDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística & Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6839-9148
Dmitri PetrovDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, California, USA.
Rosemary G GillespieBerkeley Evolab, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, UC Berkeley, California, USA.
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKNatural History Museum Vienna · ATStanford University · USUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Genomics of rapid adaptation in the lab and in the wildR35GM118165 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Dmitri Petrov · 2016 to 2026
$8.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiders (Araneae) have a diverse spectrum of morphologies, behaviors, and physiologies. Attempts to understand the genomic-basis of this diversity are often hindered by their large, heterozygous, and AT-rich genomes with high repeat content resulting in highly fragmented, poor-quality assemblies. As a result, the key attributes of spider genomes, including gene family evolution, repeat content, and gene function, remain poorly understood. Here, we used Illumina and Dovetail Chicago technologies to sequence the genome of the long-jawed spider Tetragnatha kauaiensis, producing an assembly distributed along 3,925 scaffolds with an N50 of ∼2 Mb. Using comparative genomics tools, we explore genome evolution across available spider assemblies. Our findings suggest that the previously reported and vast genome size variation in spiders is linked to the different representation and number of transposable elements. Using statistical tools to uncover gene-family level evolution, we find expansions associated with the sensory perception of taste, immunity, and metabolism. In addition, we report strikingly different histories of chemosensory, venom, and silk gene families, with the first two evolving much earlier, affected by the ancestral whole genome duplication in Arachnopulmonata (∼450 Ma) and exhibiting higher numbers. Together, our findings reveal that spider genomes are highly variable and that genomic novelty may have been driven by the burst of an ancient whole genome duplication, followed by gene family and transposable element expansion.

Indexed as

SpidersAnimalsGenomeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAraneaearthropodgene familyhawai'irepeatometransposable element

Identifiers

PMID34849853
PMCPMC8693713
OpenAlexW3215166357

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.