ArticleScientific reports2021
Pan-cancer analysis of non-oncogene addiction to DNA repair.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A DLBCL Prognostic model superior to the IPI score: Mechanistic study and clinical validation based on RFC2- and RFC4-mediated DNA damage repair.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- An integrated network toxicology and multi-omics framework prioritizes BRCA1 as a testable candidate in benzo[a]pyrene-associated oral cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Dynamic interplay of cNHEJ and MMEJ pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during embryonic development in zebrafish.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of the correlation between RFC4 expression and tumor immune microenvironment and prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of RFC4 as a potential biomarker for regulating the immune microenvironment and predicting immune therapy response in lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Review
- Reuniting philosophy and science to advance cancer research.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023Article
- The biological significance of cuproptosis-key gene MTF1 in pan-cancer and its inhibitory effects on ROS-mediated cell death of liver hepatocellular carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2023Article
- Exonucleases: Degrading DNA to Deal with Genome Damage, Cell Death, Inflammation and Cancer.Cells · 2022Review
- Pan-Cancer Analysis on the Oncogenic Role of Programmed Cell Death 10.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- EF-Hand Domain-Containing Protein D2 (EFHD2) Correlates with Immune Infiltration and Predicts the Prognosis of Patients: A Pan-Cancer Analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer cells usually depend on the aberrant function of one or few driver genes to initiate and promote their malignancy, an attribute known as oncogene addiction. However, cancer cells might become dependent on the normal cellular functions of certain genes that are not oncogenes but ensure cell survival (non-oncogene addiction). The downregulation or silencing of DNA repair genes and the consequent genetic and epigenetic instability is key to promote malignancy, but the activation of the DNA-damage response (DDR) has been shown to become a type of non-oncogene addiction that critically supports tumour survival. In the present study, a systematic evaluation of DNA repair addiction at the pan-cancer level was performed using data derived from The Cancer Dependency Map and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). From 241 DDR genes, 59 were identified as commonly essential in cancer cell lines. However, large differences were observed in terms of dependency scores in 423 cell lines and transcriptomic alterations across 18 cancer types. Among these 59 commonly essential genes, 14 genes were exclusively associated with better overall patient survival and 19 with worse overall survival. Notably, a specific molecular signature among the latter, characterized by DDR genes like UBE2T, RFC4, POLQ, BRIP1, and H2AFX showing the weakest dependency scores, but significant upregulation was strongly associated with worse survival. The present study supports the existence and importance of non-oncogenic addiction to DNA repair in cancer and may facilitate the identification of prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.