ReviewTrials2021
Promoting inclusion in clinical trials-a rapid review of the literature and recommendations for action.
Review in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
123 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators for engaging underrepresented ethnic minority populations in healthcare research: an umbrella review.International journal for equity in health · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of users experiences of using digital interventions within psychosis: a thematic synthesis of qualitative research.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025Pooled it
- Recommendations to promote equity, diversity and inclusion in decentralized clinical trials.Nature medicine · 2024Guideline
- Diversity in randomized clinical trials for peripheral artery disease: a systematic review.International journal for equity in health · 2024Pooled it
- Psychological Distress and Interventions for Older Victims of Crime: A Systematic Review.Trauma, violence & abuse · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- REPRESENT recommendations: improving inclusion and trust in cancer early detection research.British journal of cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Use of artificial intelligence for cancer clinical trial enrollment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Pooled it
- Ethnic minority representation in UK COVID-19 trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Psychosocial Correlates of Adherence to Mind-Body Interventions.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025Trial
- NHS-Galleri trial: Enriched enrolment approaches and sociodemographic characteristics of enrolled participants.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Outcomes among patients with peripheral artery disease in the Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness (ADAPTABLE) study.Vascular medicine (London, England) · 2023Trial
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Acceptability of Taking Part in a Large Multicentre RCT of Medication for Anxiety in Autistic Adults (the STRATA Trial).Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026Article
- Do patients and the public understand and feel engaged and valued after reading outcome set study invitations? A UK qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Faith, Culture, and Cancer: A Qualitative Study Exploring Muslim Women's Perspectives on Clinical Trials in the United Kingdom.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Article
- Translation and interpreting services must be considered across the lifecycle of clinical trials.Trials · 2026Article
63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWithout inclusion of diverse research participants, it is challenging to understand how study findings will translate into the real world. Despite this, a lack of inclusion of those from under-served groups in research is a prevailing problem due to multi-faceted barriers acting at multiple levels. Therefore, we rapidly reviewed international published literature, in relation to clinical trials, on barriers relating to inclusion, and evidence of approaches that are effective in overcoming these.
methodsA rapid literature review was conducted searching PubMed for peer-reviewed articles that discussed barriers to inclusion or strategies to improve inclusion in clinical trial research published between 2010 and 2021. Grey literature articles were excluded.
resultsSeventy-two eligible articles were included. The main barriers identified were language and communication, lack of trust, access to trials, eligibility criteria, attitudes and beliefs, lack of knowledge around clinical trials, and logistical and practical issues. In relation to evidence-based strategies and enablers, two key themes arose: [1] a multi-faceted approach is essential [2]; no single strategy was universally effective either within or between trials. The key evidence-based strategies identified were cultural competency training, community partnerships, personalised approach, multilingual materials and staff, communication-specific strategies, increasing understanding and trust, and tackling logistical barriers.
conclusionsMany of the barriers relating to inclusion are the same as those that impact trial design and healthcare delivery generally. However, the presentation of these barriers among different under-served groups may be unique to each population's particular circumstances, background, and needs. Based on the literature, we make 15 recommendations that, if implemented, may help improve inclusion within clinical trials and clinical research more generally. The three main recommendations include improving cultural competency and sensitivity of all clinical trial staff through training and ongoing personal development, the need to establish a diverse community advisory panel for ongoing input into the research process, and increasing recruitment of staff from under-served groups. Implementation of these recommendations may help improve representation of under-served groups in clinical trials which would improve the external validity of associated findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.