Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34863779›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular biology2022

Modeling Innate Antiviral Immunity in Physiological Context.

Monty E Goldstein, Margaret A Scull

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Application of Organoids in the Study of Antiviral Innate Immunity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Engineering complexity in human tissue models of cancer.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monty E GoldsteinDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, Maryland Pathogen Research Institute, 3134 Bioscience Research Building, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Margaret A ScullDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, Maryland Pathogen Research Institute, 3134 Bioscience Research Building, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. Electronic address: scull@umd.edu.
Bioscience Research · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms and In Vivo Impact of Tethered Mucin 1-Influenza Virus InteractionsR01HL151840 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SCULL, MARGARET ADELE · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Graduate Training in VirologyT32AI125186 · NIAID · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SIMON, ANNE ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2020
$1.3M
Rhinovirus C Infection in Normal and Asthmatic Human Airway Epithelium at Single Cell ResolutionR21AI149180 · NIAID · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI ROSENBERG, BRAD, SCULL, MARGARET ADELE · 2020 to 2021
$461k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151840NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI149180NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI125186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An effective innate antiviral response is critical for the mitigation of severe disease and host survival following infection. In vivo, the innate antiviral response is triggered by cells that detect the invading pathogen and then communicate through autocrine and paracrine signaling to stimulate the expression of genes that inhibit viral replication, curtail cell proliferation, or modulate the immune response. In other words, the innate antiviral response is complex and dynamic. Notably, in the laboratory, culturing viruses and assaying viral life cycles frequently utilizes cells that are derived from tissues other than those that support viral replication during natural infection, while the study of viral pathogenesis often employs animal models. In recapitulating the human antiviral response, it is important to consider that variation in the expression and function of innate immune sensors and antiviral effectors exists across species, cell types, and cell differentiation states, as well as when cells are placed in different contexts. Thus, to gain novel insight into the dynamics of the host response and how specific sensors and effectors impact infection kinetics by a particular virus, the model system must be selected carefully. In this review, we briefly introduce key signaling pathways involved in the innate antiviral response and highlight how these differ between systems. We then review the application of tissue-engineered or 3D models for studying the antiviral response, and suggest how these in vitro culture systems could be further utilized to assay physiologically-relevant host responses and reveal novel insight into virus-host interactions.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateVirusesAnimalsHost-Pathogen InteractionsSignal TransductionVirus Replicationinterferonmicroenvironmentorganoidspattern recognition receptorstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID34863779
PMCPMC8940657
OpenAlexW3217785176

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.