Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34865945›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2022

Clinical pharmacology of cytotoxic drugs in neonates and infants: Providing evidence-based dosing guidance.

A Laura Nijstad, Shelby Barnett, Arief Lalmohamed, Inez M Bérénos, Elizabeth Parke, Vickyanne Carruthers, Deborah A Tweddle, Jordon Kong, C Michel Zwaan, Alwin D R Huitema and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Haematologica · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

A Laura NijstadDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Pharmacology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: A.L.Nijstad-2@umcutrecht.nl.
Shelby BarnettNewcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, NE2 4HH Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Arief LalmohamedDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Inez M BérénosUtrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Elizabeth ParkeNewcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, NE2 4HH Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Vickyanne CarruthersNewcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, NE2 4HH Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Deborah A TweddleNewcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, NE2 4HH Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Great North Children's Hospital, NE1 4LP Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Jordon KongDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
C Michel ZwaanPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Alwin D R HuitemaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Pharmacology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gareth J VealNewcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, NE2 4HH Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. Electronic address: gareth.veal@newcastle.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GBHeidelberg University · DEUtrecht University · NLGreat North Children's Hospital · GBPrincess Máxima Center · NLUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C9380/A25138Cancer Research UK C9380/A25169Department of Health PB-PG-1216-20032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer in neonates and infants is a rare but challenging entity. Treatment is complicated by marked physiological changes during the first year of life, excess rates of toxicity, mortality, and late effects. Dose optimisation of chemotherapeutics may be an important step to improving outcomes. Body size-based dosing is used for most anticancer drugs used in infants. However, dose regimens are generally not evidence based, and dosing strategies are frequently inconsistent between tumour types and treatment protocols. In this review, we collate available pharmacological evidence supporting dosing regimens in infants for a wide range of cytotoxic drugs. A systematic review was conducted, and available data ranked by a level of evidence (1-5) and a grade of recommendation (A-D) provided on a consensus basis, with recommended dosing approaches indicated as appropriate. For 9 of 29 drugs (busulfan, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, etoposide, fludarabine, isotretinoin, melphalan and vincristine), grade A was scored, indicating sufficient pharmacological evidence to recommend a dosing algorithm for infants. For busulfan and carboplatin, sufficient data were available to recommend therapeutic drug monitoring in infants. For eight drugs (actinomycin D, blinatumomab, dinutuximab, doxorubicin, mercaptopurine, pegaspargase, thioguanine and topotecan), some pharmacological evidence was available to guide dosing (graded as B). For the remaining drugs, including commonly used agents such as cisplatin, cytarabine, ifosfamide, and methotrexate, pharmacological evidence for dosing in infants was limited or non-existent: grades C and D were scored for 10 and 2 drugs, respectively. The review provides clinically relevant evidence-based dosing guidance for cytotoxic drugs in neonates and infants.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBusulfanAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinEtoposideHumansInfantInfant, NewbornAntineoplastic AgentsBusulfanCarboplatinEtoposideAntineoplastic agentsChildClinical protocolsInfantMedical oncologyPaediatricsPharmacokineticsPharmacologyTherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34865945
PMCPMC8914347
OpenAlexW4200410991

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.