ArticleFrontiers in public health2021
Prioritisation Assessment and Robust Predictive System for Medical Equipment: A Comprehensive Strategic Maintenance Management.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multi-Criteria Decision Support Framework for Prioritizing the Repair of Failed Medical Devices: A Hospital Case Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The role of medical equipment reliability assessment in improving healthcare service quality: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- A risk-stratified framework for in-house PLA 3D printing of non-critical medical device spare parts: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A data-driven priority assessment and deployment framework for medical equipment maintenance in a tertiary hospital.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Assessment of post-pandemic NAAT-based diagnostic capacity among laboratories with COVID-19 testing resource investments in Indonesia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Malaysia's primary healthcare public‒private partnership venture: the Medical Equipment Enhancement Tenure (MEET) initiative.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- From warehouse to ward: applying implementation research methods to the device identification, qualification, distribution, and management process within the Newborn Essential Solutions and Technologies (NEST360) alliance.BMC global and public health · 2025Article
- Structural imbalance of medical resources amid population mobility and digital empowerment: a study of national and port-developed provinces in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Systematic review of predictive maintenance and digital twin technologies challenges, opportunities, and best practices.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- The digitization process and the evolution of Clinical Risk Management concept: The role of Clinical Engineering in the operational management of biomedical technologies.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Critical Device Reliability Assessment in Healthcare Services.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Review
- Transforming medical equipment management in digital public health: a decision-making model for medical equipment replacement.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Predicting medical device failure: a promise to reduce healthcare facilities cost through smart healthcare management.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advancement of technology in medical equipment has significantly improved healthcare services. However, failures in upkeeping reliability, availability, and safety affect the healthcare services quality and significant impact can be observed in operations' expenses. The effective and comprehensive medical equipment assessment and monitoring throughout the maintenance phase of the asset life cycle can enhance the equipment reliability, availability, and safety. The study aims to develop the prioritisation assessment and predictive systems that measure the priority of medical equipment's preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, and replacement programmes. The proposed predictive model is constructed by analysing features of 13,352 medical equipment used in public healthcare clinics in Malaysia. The proposed system comprises three stages: prioritisation analysis, model training, and predictive model development. In this study, we proposed 16 combinations of novel features to be used for prioritisation assessment and prediction of preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, and replacement programme. The modified k-Means algorithm is proposed during the prioritisation analysis to automatically distinguish raw data into three main clusters of prioritisation assessment. Subsequently, these clusters are fed into and tested with six machine learning algorithms for the predictive prioritisation system. The best predictive models for medical equipment's preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, and replacement programmes are selected among the tested machine learning algorithms. Findings indicate that the Support Vector Machine performs the best in preventive maintenance and replacement programme prioritisation predictive systems with the highest accuracy of 99.42 and 99.80%, respectively. Meanwhile, K-Nearest Neighbour yielded the highest accuracy in corrective maintenance prioritisation predictive systems with 98.93%. Based on the promising results, clinical engineers and healthcare providers can widely adopt the proposed prioritisation assessment and predictive systems in managing expenses, reporting, scheduling, materials, and workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.