ArticleOncoscience2021
No limit to maximal lifespan in humans: how to beat a 122-year-old record.
Article in Oncoscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional Dentition Life Expectancy (FDLE): a novel indicator for monitoring oral health in ageing populations.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Article
- Proteome Size Is Positively Correlated with Lifespan in Mammals but Negatively Correlated with Lifespan in Birds.Advanced biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Age-associated myeloid malignancies - the role of STAT3 and STAT5 in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.FEBS letters · 2024Review
- Ethical concerns in aging research: perspectives of global frontline researchers.Science China. Life sciences · 2024Article
- Role of Phytochemicals in Treatment of Aging and Cancer: Focus on Mechanism of FOXO3 Activation.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Species Distribution, Typical Clinical Features and Risk Factors for Poor Prognosis of Super-Elderly Patients with Bloodstream Infection in China.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
- Towards disease-oriented dosing of rapamycin for longevity: does aging exist or only age-related diseases?Aging · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although average human life expectancy is rising, the maximum lifespan is not increasing. Leading demographers claim that human lifespan is fixed at a natural limit around 122 years. However, there is no fixed limit in animals. In animals, anti-aging interventions (dietary restrictions, rapamycin, genetic manipulations) postpone age-related diseases and thus automatically extend maximum lifespan. In humans, anti-aging interventions have not been yet implemented. Instead, by treating individual diseases, medical interventions allow a patient to live longer (despite morbidity), expanding morbidity span. In contrast, slowly aging individuals (centenarians) enter very old age in good health, but, when diseases finally develop, they do not receive thorough medical care and die fast. Although the oldest old die from age-related diseases, death certificates often list "old age", meaning that diseases were not even diagnosed and even less treated. The concept of absolute compression of morbidity is misleading in humans (in truth, there is no other way to compress morbidity as by denying thorough medical care) and false in animals (in truth, anti-aging interventions do not condense morbidity, they postpone it). Anti-aging interventions such as rapamycin may potentially extend both healthspan and maximal lifespan in humans. Combining anti-aging medicine with cutting-edge medical care, regardless of chronological age, will extend maximal lifespan further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.