ArticleScientific reports2021
Systems biology and machine learning approaches identify drug targets in diabetic nephropathy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Target identification and assessment in the era of AI.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Identification and validation of an explainable prediction model of favorable outcome under integrative medicine treatment exposure in DKD adult patients: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- DrugTar improves druggability prediction by integrating large language models and gene ontologies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- The Role of miR-802 in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Generative artificial intelligence: In the search for new landscapes in basic and clinical nephrology.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025Article
- From bytes to nephrons: AI's journey in diabetic kidney disease.Journal of nephrology · 2025Review
- Exploring Scoring Function Space: Developing Computational Models for Drug Discovery.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Precision Medicine Approaches to Diabetic Kidney Disease: Personalized Interventions on the Horizon.Cureus · 2023Review
- Chronic kidney disease and gut microbiota.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Network-based identification and prioritization of key transcriptional factors of diabetic kidney disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- miR-802-5p is a key regulator in diabetic kidney disease.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic nephropathy (DN), the leading cause of end-stage renal disease, has become a massive global health burden. Despite considerable efforts, the underlying mechanisms have not yet been comprehensively understood. In this study, a systematic approach was utilized to identify the microRNA signature in DN and to introduce novel drug targets (DTs) in DN. Using microarray profiling followed by qPCR confirmation, 13 and 6 differentially expressed (DE) microRNAs were identified in the kidney cortex and medulla, respectively. The microRNA-target interaction networks for each anatomical compartment were constructed and central nodes were identified. Moreover, enrichment analysis was performed to identify key signaling pathways. To develop a strategy for DT prediction, the human proteome was annotated with 65 biochemical characteristics and 23 network topology parameters. Furthermore, all proteins targeted by at least one FDA-approved drug were identified. Next, mGMDH-AFS, a high-performance machine learning algorithm capable of tolerating massive imbalanced size of the classes, was developed to classify DT and non-DT proteins. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision of the proposed method were 90%, 86%, 88%, and 89%, respectively. Moreover, it significantly outperformed the state-of-the-art (P-value ≤ 0.05) and showed very good diagnostic accuracy and high agreement between predicted and observed class labels. The cortex and medulla networks were then analyzed with this validated machine to identify potential DTs. Among the high-rank DT candidates are Egfr, Prkce, clic5, Kit, and Agtr1a which is a current well-known target in DN. In conclusion, a combination of experimental and computational approaches was exploited to provide a holistic insight into the disorder for introducing novel therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.