Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34873413›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

A Comparison among Different Machine Learning Pretest Approaches to Predict Stress-Induced Ischemia at PET/CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

Rosario Megna, Mario Petretta, Roberta Assante, Emilia Zampella, Carmela Nappi, Valeria Gaudieri, Teresa Mannarino, Adriana D'Antonio, Roberta Green, Valeria Cantoni and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Machine learning to predict hemodynamically significant CAD based on traditional risk factors, coronary artery calcium and epicardial fat volume.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosario MegnaInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Council of Research, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5716-2137
Mario PetrettaIRCCS-SDN, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8001-4298
Roberta AssanteDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Emilia ZampellaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8787-731X
Carmela NappiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9440-9055
Valeria GaudieriDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0560-2997
Teresa MannarinoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Adriana D'AntonioDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Roberta GreenDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2659-2318
Valeria CantoniDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3802-3104
Parthiban ArumugamDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Wanda AcampaInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Council of Research, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2187-4076
Alberto CuocoloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3431-7658
Federico II University Hospital · ITInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging · ITManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBSDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional approach for predicting coronary artery disease (CAD) is based on demographic data, symptoms such as chest pain and dyspnea, and comorbidity related to cardiovascular diseases. Usually, these variables are analyzed by logistic regression to quantifying their relationship with the outcome; nevertheless, their predictive value is limited. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the value of different machine learning (ML) techniques for the evaluation of suspected CAD; having as gold standard, the presence of stress-induced ischemia by

Indexed as

Machine LearningAgedAlgorithmsBayes TheoremCohort StudiesComputational BiologyCoronary Artery DiseaseDecision TreesExercise TestFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial Perfusion Imaging

Identifiers

PMID34873413
PMCPMC8643229
OpenAlexW3215978285

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.