Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34875282›Full record

Trial reportJournal of affective disorders2022

Adapting behavioral activation for perinatal depression and anxiety in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and racial injustice.

Daisy R Singla, Sabrina Hossain, Paula Ravitz, Crystal E Schiller, Nicole Andrejek, Jo Kim, Laura La Porte, Samantha E Meltzer-Brody, Richard Silver, Simone N Vigod and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of affective disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Daisy R SinglaCampbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Center of Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: daisy.singla@utoronto.ca.
Sabrina HossainLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Paula RavitzDepartment of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health, Toronto, Canada.
Crystal E SchillerDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States.
Nicole AndrejekLunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Jo KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL, United States.
Laura La PorteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL, United States.
Samantha E Meltzer-BrodyDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States.
Richard SilverDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL, United States.
Simone N VigodDepartment of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
James W JungDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Sona DimidjianRenee Crown Wellness Institute and Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States.
Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute · CANorthShore University HealthSystem · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Toronto · CACrown College · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe examined the implementation of a brief, behavioural activation (BA) model, via telemedicine, for perinatal populations during a confluence of significant global events in 2020. We conducted a rigorous qualitative study to identify relevant barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of both perinatal participants and treatment providers. We also present two case studies where BA was used and adapted to provide patient-centered care.

methodsWithin the ongoing SUMMIT non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in Canada and USA, we interviewed a random selection of perinatal participants (n = 23) and all treatment providers (n = 28). A content analysis framework was developed to identify relevant barriers and facilitators and frequencies were calculated for each emergent theme within and across respondent groups.

resultsKey facilitators reported by participants receiving BA were that BA helped with support and social connection (73.9%), creative problem solving (26.1%) and attending to pandemic-related symptoms (21.7%). Key facilitators endorsed by providers delivering BA were the use of telemedicine (35.7%) and loosening of government restrictions (21.4%). Both participant groups reported similar barriers to BA during the pandemic such as a lack of privacy and limited activities due to pandemic restrictions. However, providers were more likely to endorse pandemic-related life stressors as a barrier to treatment delivery compared to participants (64.3% vs. 34.8%). Both participant groups experienced explicit discussion of race and the racial justice movements during sessions as beneficial and reported harms of not doing so to the therapeutic alliance.

conclusionsBA offers a person-centered model to facilitate social connection through creative problem-solving for women with perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Explicit discussion of race and racial injustice during sessions is an important and helpful aspect in psychological treatments.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansPregnancySARS-CoV-2Behavioral activationCOVID-19EthnicityPerinatal depressionPsychotherapyRace

Identifiers

PMID34875282
PMCPMC8645290
OpenAlexW4200492562

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.