Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34881389›Full record

ArticleClinical science (London, England : 1979)2021

Mechanistic science in cardiovascular-oncology: the way forward to maximise anti-cancer drug effects and minimise cardiovascular toxicity.

Ninian N Lang, Rhian M Touyz

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ninian N LangInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0001-8441-6887
Rhian M TouyzResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0670-0887

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/19/64/34434British Heart Foundation RE/18/6/34217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dramatic improvements in cancer survival have arisen because of the rapid development of novel anti-cancer therapies. The potential for cardiovascular toxicity associated with these drugs often reflects overlap between pathogenic cancer mechanisms and physiological pathways required for normal cardiovascular function. Clinical Science has, therefore, compiled a themed collection on Cardiovascular-Oncology. This collection examines the intersection between cancer treatments and their potentially harmful cardiovascular effects. By defining the mechanisms underlying unwanted cardiovascular effects of anti-cancer therapies, cardioprotective strategies can be developed. Only by doing so, will patients be able to achieve optimal cancer treatment at the minimum cost to cardiovascular health.

Indexed as

AnthracyclinesAntineoplastic AgentsCardiotoxicityHumansImmunotherapyMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Agentscancercardiovascular diseasepharmacology

Identifiers

PMID34881389
PMCPMC8672202

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.