Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34884583›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

CRISPR Screen Contributes to Novel Target Discovery in Prostate Cancer.

Takuya Tsujino, Kazumasa Komura, Teruo Inamoto, Haruhito Azuma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cancer centers of excellence for the multidisciplinary management of urologic cancers The intersection between education, research, and healthcare.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Takuya TsujinoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.
Kazumasa KomuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.
Teruo InamotoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.
Haruhito AzumaDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the common malignancies in male adults. Recent advances in omics technology, especially in next-generation sequencing, have increased the opportunity to identify genes that correlate with cancer diseases, including PCa. In addition, a genetic screen based on CRISPR/Cas9 technology has elucidated the mechanisms of cancer progression and drug resistance, which in turn has enabled the discovery of new targets as potential genes for new therapeutic targets. In the era of precision medicine, such knowledge is crucial for clinicians in their decision-making regarding patient treatment. In this review, we focus on how CRISPR screen for PCa performed to date has contributed to the identification of biologically critical and clinically relevant target genes.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDrug DiscoveryGene EditingAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorHumansMalePrecision MedicineProstatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCRISPR/Cas9CRISPR screenprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID34884583
PMCPMC8658029

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.