Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34894208›Full record

ReviewRevista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia2022

Pharmacological treatment of COVID-19: an opinion paper.

A García-Lledó, J Gómez-Pavón, J González Del Castillo, T Hernández-Sampelayo, M C Martín-Delgado, F J Martín Sánchez, M Martínez-Sellés, J M Molero García, S Moreno Guillén, F J Rodríguez-Artalejo and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

A García-Lledó
J Gómez-Pavón
J González Del Castillo
T Hernández-Sampelayo
M C Martín-Delgado
F J Martín Sánchez
M Martínez-Sellés
J M Molero García
S Moreno Guillén
F J Rodríguez-Artalejo
J Ruiz-Galiana
R Cantón
P De Lucas Ramos
A García-Botella
E BouzaServicio de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense. CIBERES. Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias. Madrid, Spain. emilio.bouza@gmail.com.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESEU Business School · CHHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESUniversidad Alfonso X el Sabio · ESUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precocity and efficacy of the vaccines developed so far against COVID-19 has been the most significant and saving advance against the pandemic. The development of vaccines has not prevented, during the whole period of the pandemic, the constant search for therapeutic medicines, both among existing drugs with different indications and in the development of new drugs. The Scientific Committee of the COVID-19 of the Illustrious College of Physicians of Madrid wanted to offer an early, simplified and critical approach to these new drugs, to new developments in immunotherapy and to what has been learned from the immune response modulators already known and which have proven effective against the virus, in order to help understand the current situation.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntiviral AgentsHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Antiviral AgentsAdalimumabAnakinraAZD7442AzithromycinBanlanivimabBaricitinibBRII-196BRII-198CanakinumabCasirivimabCertolizumabCiganilmabColchicineconvalescent plasmaCOVID-19DexamethasoneEtanerceptEtesevimabEvusheldFavipiravirFluvoxamineGolimumabHydroxychloroquineImdevinabInfliximabItolizumabIvermectinLemilumabLopinavir/RitonavirMetforminMolnupiravirPaxlovidPF-07321332RavulizumabRemdesivirRuxolitinibSarilumabSARS-CoV-2SotrovimabTixagevimabTocilizumabTofacitinibtreatmentVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID34894208
PMCPMC8972693
OpenAlexW4200315446

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.