ReviewArchives of medical science : AMS2021
Contracting COVID-19 in the first and second trimester of pregnancy: what we know - a concise qualitative systematic review.
Review in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Pooled it
- The pregnancy outcomes of women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester ---a longitudinal cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- COVID-19 Vaccination and Reproductive Health: a Comprehensive Review for Healthcare Providers.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Review
- A placental model of SARS-CoV-2 infection reveals ACE2-dependent susceptibility and differentiation impairment in syncytiotrophoblasts.Nature cell biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Impact of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy and neonates: A case control study.Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecent medical literature has drawn attention to the possible influence of COVID-19 on the course of pregnancies. As the coherence of results seems to vary, especially in relation to first and second trimester pregnancies, a concise qualitative systematic review can shed light on the most recent data. MATERIAL AND
methodsA structured systematic search was performed to collect all COVID-19 pregnancy-related articles published between January 1 and September 16, 2020. Two independent reviewers evaluated studies using the STROBE statement in combination with the CERQual quality assessment of findings.
resultsIn total 1387 articles were screened and finally 22 studies were evaluated (179 1
conclusionsEvidently a limited amount of data is available. Usually, mothers and newborns are discharged from the hospital without any serious complications. Further observations are imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.