ArticleBioactive materials2022
Two-stage degradation and novel functional endothelium characteristics of a 3-D printed bioresorbable scaffold.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in 3D-Printed Bioresorbable Vascular Stents: Toward Patient-Specific, Novel-Structured, Functional, and Smart Devices.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Additive Manufacturing of Polymeric Bioresorbable Stents: A Mechanical Performance Perspective.Biomaterials research · 2026Review
- Mechanically robust neuroprotective stent by sequential Mg ions release for ischemic stroke therapy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Innovations in Vascular Repair from Mechanical Intervention to Regenerative Therapies.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Microenvironment-responsive coating for vascular stents to regulate coagulation-inflammation interaction and promote vascular recovery.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- A novel paclitaxel eluting bioresorbable vascular stent with a super flexible stent structure and round cross section struts fabricated using 3D printing technology with a rotating platform.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Tremendous advances, multifaceted challenges and feasible future prospects of biodegradable medical polymer materials.RSC advances · 2024Review
- Structural and temporal dynamics analysis of zinc-based biomaterials: History, research hotspots and emerging trends.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Safety and efficacy of a novel 3D-printed bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold in a porcine model.AsiaIntervention · 2023Article
- Structural and temporal dynamics analysis on drug-eluting stents: History, research hotspots and emerging trends.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles increase risk of cardiovascular diseases by inducing endothelium dysfunction and inflammation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023Article
- Comprehensive review of materials, applications, and future innovations in biodegradable esophageal stents.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- The endothelium permeability after bioresorbable scaffolds implantation caused by the heterogeneous expression of tight junction proteins.Materials today. Bio · 2022Article
- Advances in the development of biodegradable coronary stents: A translational perspective.Materials today. Bio · 2022Review
- A review on biodegradable biliary stents: materials and future trends.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- The application of inferior vena cava filters in orthopaedics and current research advances.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioresorbable scaffolds have emerged as a new generation of vascular implants for the treatment of atherosclerosis, and designed to provide a temporary scaffold that is subsequently absorbed by blood vessels over time. Presently, there is insufficient data on the biological and mechanical responses of blood vessels accompanied by bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) degradation. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the inflexion point of degradation, the response of blood vessels, and the pathophysiological process of vascular, as results of such studies will be of great value for the design of next generation of BRS. In this study, abdominal aortas of SD rats were received 3-D printed poly-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.