Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34904403›Full record

ReviewThe plant genome2022

Pangenomics in crop improvement-from coding structural variations to finding regulatory variants with pangenome graphs.

Silvia F Zanini, Philipp E Bayer, Rachel Wells, Rod J Snowdon, Jacqueline Batley, Rajeev K Varshney, Henry T Nguyen, David Edwards, Agnieszka A Golicz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The plant genome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in mutant characterization for detecting causal mutations in crop plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  2. Accessing crop genetic diversity via pangenomics.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Graphical pangenomics-enabled characterization of structural variant impact on gene expression in Brassica napus.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  17. The pan-NLRome analysis based on 23 genomes reveals the diversity of NLRs inMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Silvia F ZaniniDep. of Plant Breeding, IFZ Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig Univ. Giessen, Giessen, 35392, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9137-8783
Philipp E BayerSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8530-3067
Rachel WellsDep. of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR47UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1280-7472
Rod J SnowdonDep. of Plant Breeding, IFZ Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig Univ. Giessen, Giessen, 35392, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5577-7616
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5391-5824
Rajeev K VarshneyCenter of Excellence in Genomics & Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-9131
Henry T NguyenDivision of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-6760
Agnieszka A GoliczDep. of Plant Breeding, IFZ Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig Univ. Giessen, Giessen, 35392, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9711-4826

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000PR9788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first reported crop pangenome in 2014, advances in high-throughput and cost-effective DNA sequencing technologies facilitated multiple such studies including the pangenomes of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], rice (Oryza sativa L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Compared with single-reference genomes, pangenomes provide a more accurate representation of the genetic variation present in a species. By combining the genomic data of multiple accessions, pangenomes allow for the detection and annotation of complex DNA polymorphisms such as structural variations (SVs), one of the major determinants of genetic diversity within a species. In this review we summarize the current literature on crop pangenomics, focusing on their application to find candidate SVs involved in traits of agronomic interest. We then highlight the potential of pangenomes in the discovery and functional characterization of noncoding regulatory sequences and their variations. We conclude with a summary and outlook on innovative data structures representing the complete content of plant pangenomes including annotations of coding and noncoding elements and outcomes of transcriptomic and epigenomic experiments.

Indexed as

HordeumOryzaGenome, PlantGenomicsGlycine maxSequence Analysis, DNATriticum

Identifiers

PMID34904403
PMCPMC12806906

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.