Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34906207›Full record

SynthesisGenome biology2021

Flimma: a federated and privacy-aware tool for differential gene expression analysis.

Olga Zolotareva, Reza Nasirigerdeh, Julian Matschinske, Reihaneh Torkzadehmahani, Mohammad Bakhtiari, Tobias Frisch, Julian Späth, David B Blumenthal, Amir Abbasinejad, Paolo Tieri and 5 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genome biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. AI in microbiome-related healthcare.Microbial biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Olga Zolotareva *Chair of Experimental Bioinformatics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany. olya.zolotareva@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9424-8052
Reza Nasirigerdeh *AI in Medicine and Healthcare, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julian MatschinskeInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Reihaneh TorkzadehmahaniAI in Medicine and Healthcare, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Mohammad BakhtiariInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias FrischDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Julian SpäthInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
David B BlumenthalDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Amir AbbasinejadChair of Experimental Bioinformatics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Paolo TieriCNR National Research Council, IAC Institute for Applied Computing, Rome, Italy.
Georgios KaissisAI in Medicine and Healthcare, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel RückertAI in Medicine and Healthcare, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nina K WenkeInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Markus ListChair of Experimental Bioinformatics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Jan BaumbachInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aggregating transcriptomics data across hospitals can increase sensitivity and robustness of differential expression analyses, yielding deeper clinical insights. As data exchange is often restricted by privacy legislation, meta-analyses are frequently employed to pool local results. However, the accuracy might drop if class labels are inhomogeneously distributed among cohorts. Flimma ( https://exbio.wzw.tum.de/flimma/ ) addresses this issue by implementing the state-of-the-art workflow limma voom in a federated manner, i.e., patient data never leaves its source site. Flimma results are identical to those generated by limma voom on aggregated datasets even in imbalanced scenarios where meta-analysis approaches fail.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionPrivacyBiomedical ResearchComputer Communication NetworksComputer SecurityDatabases, FactualGenesGovernment RegulationHumansMachine LearningDifferential expression analysisFederated learningMeta-analysisPrivacy of biomedical data

Identifiers

PMID34906207
PMCPMC8670124

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.