Evidence mapPaperPMID 34907285Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

Improved HbA1c and reduced glycaemic variability after 1-year intermittent use of flash glucose monitoring.

Wenhui Zhang, Yu Liu, Baosheng Sun, Yanjun Shen, Ming Li, Lanbo Peng, Honggang Duan, Xudong Su, Shaoxia Lu, Xiaoqin Tian and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Leveraging continuous glucose monitoring as a catalyst for behaviour change: a scoping review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Editorial: Technologies for diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wenhui ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Yu LiuCadre Health Care Department, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Baosheng SunDepartment of Endocrinology, Liaocheng Veterans Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Yanjun ShenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Ming LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Lanbo PengDepartment of Endocrinology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Honggang DuanDepartment of Endocrinology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Xudong SuDepartment of Endocrinology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Shaoxia LuDepartment of Endocrinology, Liaocheng Veterans Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Xiaoqin TianDepartment of Endocrinology, Liaocheng Central Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Yaqiang TianDepartment of Endocrinology, Liaocheng Veterans Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China. tyq13346255990@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) was introduced in China in 2016, and it might improve HbA1c measurements and reduce glycaemic variability during T1DM therapy. A total of 146 patients were recruited from October 2018 to September 2019 in Liaocheng. The patients were randomly divided into the FGM group or self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) group. Both groups wore the FGM device for multiple 2-week periods, beginning with the 1st, 24th, and 48th weeks for gathering data, while blood samples were also collected for HbA1c measurement. Dietary guidance and insulin dose adjustments were provided to the FGM group patients according to their Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) and to the SMBG group patients according to their SMBG measurements taken 3-4 times daily. All of the participants underwent SMBG measurements on the days when not wearing the FGM device. At the final visit, HbA1c, time in range (TIR), duration of hypoglycaemia and the number of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) events were taken as the main endpoints. There were no significant difference in the baseline characteristics of the two groups. At 24 weeks, the HbA1c level of the FGM group was 8.16 ± 1.03%, which was much lower than that of the SMBG group (8.68 ± 1.01%) (p = 0.003). The interquartile range (IQR), mean blood glucose (MBG), and the duration of hypoglycaemia in the FGM group also showed significant declines, compared with the SMBG group (p < 0.05), while the TIR increased in the FGM group [(49.39 ± 17.54)% vs (42.44 ± 15.49)%] (p = 0.012). At 48 weeks, the differences were more pronounced (p < 0.01). There were no observed changes in the number of episodes of DKA by the end of the study [(0.25 ± 0.50) vs (0.28 ± 0.51), p = 0.75]. Intermittent use of FGM by T1DM patients can improve their HbA1c and glycaemic control without increasing the hypoglycaemic exposure in insulin-treated individuals with type 1 diabetes in an developing country.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringChinaFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaInsulinMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanInsulin

Identifiers

PMID34907285
PMCPMC8671539

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.