ArticleEuropean journal of hybrid imaging2021
Combined simultaneous FDG-PET/MRI with T1 and T2 mapping as an imaging biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of suspected cardiac sarcoidosis.
Article in European journal of hybrid imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03356756 (Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Combined PET/MRI in Inflammatory Cardiomyopathies and Sarcoidosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Combined PET/MRI in Inflammatory Cardiomyopathies and Sarcoidosis
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electroanatomic Voltage-Guided Endomyocardial Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Isolated Cardiac Sarcoidosis.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- The Role of Hybrid PET-MRI in the Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of T2 mapping in cardiac sarcoidosis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Position Statement on Multimodal Cardiac Imaging in Patients with Systemic Diseases - 2026.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Article
- Diagnostic challenges in isolated cardiac sarcoidosis.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Interpreting a Thick Myocardium on Cardiac MR: A Practical Guide for Radiologists.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026Review
- Granulomas in the Heart: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Clinical utility of segmental native T1 mapping for diagnosis and risk-stratification in cardiac sarcoidosis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- A framework for exclusion of alternative diagnoses in sarcoidosis.Journal of autoimmunity · 2024Review
- Recent Progress of Cardiac MRI for Nuclear Medicine Professionals.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Utilizing Cardiac MRI and PET-CT.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Exploring the latest advances inAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Great mimicker: definite isolated cardiac sarcoidosis masquerading as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- The clinical value of quantitative cardiovascular molecular imaging: a step towards precision medicine.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Myocardial glucose suppression may interfere with the detection of inflammatory cells with FDG-PET as suggested in a canine model of myocardial infarction.EJNMMI research · 2023Article
- Combined FDG PET/MRI versus Standard-of-Care Imaging in the Evaluation of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2023Article
- Tales from the future-nuclear cardio-oncology, from prediction to diagnosis and monitoring.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2023Review
- Quantitative myocardial T2 mapping adds value to Japanese circulation society diagnostic criteria for active cardiac sarcoidosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- Positron Emission Tomography in Heart Failure: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Application.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination.Heart failure clinics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic significance of combined cardiac
methodsPatients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis were prospectively enrolled for cardiac
resultsForty-two patients (53 ± 13 years, 67% male) were evaluated, 13 (31%) with a final diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. Among patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, 100% of patients had at least one abnormality on PET/MRI: FDG uptake in 69%, LGE in 100%, elevated T1 and ECV in 100%, and elevated T2 in 46%. FDG uptake co-localized with LGE in 69% of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis compared to 24% of those without, p = 0.014. Diagnostic specificity for cardiac sarcoidosis was highest for FDG uptake (69%), elevated T2 (79%), and FDG uptake co-localizing with LGE (76%). Diagnostic sensitivity was highest for LGE, elevated T1 and ECV (100%). After median follow-up duration of 634 days, 13 patients experienced MACE. All patients who experienced MACE had LGE, elevated T1 and elevated ECV. FDG uptake (HR 14.7, p = 0.002), elevated T2 (HR 9.0, p = 0.002) and native T1 (HR 1.1 per 10 ms increase, p = 0.044) were significant predictors of MACE even after adjusting for left ventricular ejection fraction and immune suppression treatment. The presence of FDG uptake co-localizing with LGE had the highest diagnostic performance overall (AUC 0.73) and was the best predictor of MACE based on model goodness of fit (HR 14.9, p = 0.001).
conclusionsCombined cardiac FDG-PET/MRI with T1/T2 mapping provides complementary diagnostic information and predicts MACE in patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.